P3SMM with support for 100x plan using ECN method

This is the previous "ecn method compatible" version. You can read more about it in the "100x Plan with P3SMM" in the "Pips Earned 0 Pips" section of the Pre-Sale Products section. Please check the comments and the community. I'd love for you to see the various interactions in the community, but at the very least, I'll copy the "comments" section of the product at the bottom of this page. (Added April 11, 2014) The back testing and default settings are from 1999 with maximum risk taken for maximum results. Therefore, please do not run the product with default settings as is on a high account balance after purchase. The development concept is for those who are willing to give up $1100 to skip the whole thing! The development concept is intended for those who are willing to give up the entire amount for $1100. Please operate with small amounts, starting with a martingale of 0.01, 0.11, or 1.20. If your assets increase by a factor of 100, you will have ball sizes of 1.00, 11.00, and 120.00. If you lose on those larger balls, you will lose on the larger balls. The feeling of loss when you lose with such a large amount of money is unimaginable, so you should make regular withdrawals and save as much money as possible so that you can escape with a win. However, please note that there is a possibility that the drawdown will come early and you will not be able to reach the point of withdrawing your money at all. We will also be posting new information on the following web site, so please check it out even before you buy. http://ameblo.jp/gabora-123/ (Addition) P3S" means that "P" stands for "parent" and "3S" for "three children. As you can see from a quick look at the explanations of Nero's previous works, this EA is also basically a martingale with completely different trading opportunities without any nan-pinning. We have also added a new variable trader using the parent and offspring to it. First of all, the martingale method is to use different trading opportunities, but the minimum basic lots are 1, 11, and 120. (in thousands of currency units). The limit is 45 and the stop is 270, which is 6 times larger than the limit, so the open interest can be increased only twice in a martingale. Although it is possible to lose money with a martingale of 1, 6, and 42, we aimed for an aggressive and aggressive martingale. In the case of the "nan-pin" (which is not exactly the same as "irregular nan-pin," but the image is very different), the first child arrives 25 pips before the parent is cut off, after being retraced from the parent. Then, 5 pips before the first child ball is cut off, the second child ball arrives. Lastly, 5 pips before the second child is cut off, the third child arrives. If you are lucky, the child will work like a repeat ifdan. This means that the third child will appear 775 pips backward from the parent, without the spread, and 27 The risk of a repeat if the parent is 775 pips backward, and the risk of a child 3 is 1045 pips backward, so the risk of a repeat if the parent is 27 pips backward. I think that the risk of a move is fairly low. The sizes of open interest are basically 1, 6, and 42, and we are not too adventurous here. The numbers in the above explanation are the default settings (from the back test), so of course you should repeat the back test yourself and re-set the numbers. I later realized that I would have better results if I had used the above "Aggressive Martin"・・・・ more sparingly and made the MM's base (assets) smaller to speed up the compounding turnover. I feel that a more conservative approach and a smaller base (assets) for MM and faster compounding turnover would yield better results. I would recommend Pepperstone at 400x leverage, but I would not backtest FXDD at 2x leverage. I also thought I should do a backtest of FXDD at 2x leverage (・・・・) and did a "modest martin". 1, 11, 120 to 1, 11, 80. I changed 1, 11, 120 to 1, 11, 80. Still, the backlog was 20,000 from 11/1/08 to 20,000. The maximum drawdown was 59, 46%, in 594 trades on 12/19/11. Drawdown 59, 46%, PF 1, 92, and principal 1000 turned into $12833 ($1,100 on an MM basis is $1100). The above totals 83x in the first half of the year since 1999, 20 12, 8 times in the second half since November 2008.　　　　The total is 83 times in the first half from 1999, and 12.8 times in the second half from November 2008. Compounded for 3 years, the figure was a whopping 1062 times. This means that the asset will expand at a considerably faster pace than 100 times, so that for every $4,000 increase in assets, for example, 5% of the asset balance will be deposited in a separate account. For example, for every $4,000 in assets, make sure to save 5% of the asset balance in a separate deposit. That way, when the day comes when you can't achieve 100x, you will be able to say, "That was not so bad...".