Which two domestic securities companies does Super Recovery encourage, and what are the reasons?
I would like to introduce two domestic securities companies that are best suited to operating the EA titled Super Recovery.
I also cover two domestic securities companies that I don’t want you to use Super Recovery with, and I explain the reasons.
There is compatibility between EAs and securities companies, so what is written in this article is solely about compatibility with Super Recovery, not about the overall quality of each securities company.
I want to state this in advance to avoid any misunderstandings.
There are more images than usual to provide evidence, but I would be grateful if you could read through to the end.
The first image is the materials for the EA sales page submitted to Gogojungle.
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/systemtrade/fx/46181
This is the backtest result over two years using TDS with a certain broker.
Among domestic FX securities firms, the one that achieved the highest revenue for Super Recovery was FX Fidessa (Gaitame Finest).
The forward test currently recorded on the Gogojungle sales page also selects FX Fidessa (Gaitame Finest).
In the two-year TDS data, it shows 10x, but as noted in red text with↓↓↓, for some reason backtesting could only be completed up to October 27, 2022.
The TDS data submitted to Gogojungle correctly backtests from September 1, 2021 to September 11, 2023.
Even after inquiries, they said it was an EA issue, so I left it alone.
The forward test at Gogojungle seems to still have entries today.
Therefore, FX Fidessa yields about a 10x gain in roughly one year.
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/systemtrade/fx/46181
Here is the number one recommended domestic FX securities company in this ranking.↓↓↓
Next, I will introduce OANDA Securities.
OANDA Securities yields similar backtest results.
The measurement period is also only about one year recorded.
The figure above is a backtest conducted by importing TDS data into OANDA Securities' MT5.
Strangely, the results only go up to October 27, 2022, the same as FX Fidessa.
And the total profit and loss was not much different from FX Fidessa, about 1 million yen less.
Also, nearly within one year, assets increased by nearly 10x.
In the actual sales pages, only FX Fidessa and OANDA Securities are encouraged.
And from here on, the domestic FX securities companies that are not encouraged are listed.
For Super Recovery, the compatibility is poor with the non-encouraged Ava.
The test period is displayed from September 1, 2021 to September 11, 2023, but the historical data dropped to 98% and the number of trades became extremely low at 88 trades.
The encouraged top-ranked Super Recovery is FX Fidessa with 368 trades in one year.
In second place, OANDA Securities has 387 trades in one year.
Compared this way, Ava’s 88 trades over two years is far too few.
By the way, the historical data for the domestic accounts introduced here was exported from the same TDS and imported into each company’s MT5.
All under the same conditions with identical parameters.
I don’t know why the results differ so much by broker, but this is the result we obtained.
None of the brokers will handle EA backtests, so I would like someone who has any idea to tell me.
So with Ava, which is not encouraged, the profit over two years was about 200,000 yen.
Lastly, the one that ended up with a negative balance is Phillip Securities.
Among the four brokers, Phillip had by far the shortest test results.
The history quality is 100%, though.
The number of trades is also 71 trades for Phillip, versus 368 for FX Fidessa at the top.
In this test, only about four months of testing from September 1, 2021 to January 14, 2022 could be conducted.
As a result, 1 million yen in funds became 990,000 yen, a loss of about 10,000 yen.
This broker produced the worst backtest results for Super Recovery.
That concludes the domestic broker ranking that is most compatible with Super Recovery in this round.
However, when the same historical data exported from September 1, 2021 to September 11, 2023 was imported into four domestic brokers and backtested with the same EA and same parameters, the results turned out unexpectedly differently.
From this result, it is natural for the author that the recommended brokers are the top two domestic FX securities companies in the ranking: FX Fidessa and OANDA Securities.
Lastly, many people ask what the backtest results were like for the past seven years.
Here are those results.
Shockingly, in seven years, 1 million yen grew to just under 7 million yen.
This result differs from the initial two-year, 14x parameter you were shown at the outset.
Which would you choose: a parameter that increased assets sevenfold over the past seven years, or a parameter set that increased assets 14x over the past two years?
I would unhesitatingly choose the two-year setting that aligns with the most recent market conditions.
In any case, it was a shocking outcome.
Super Recovery, which yielded 14 million yen in the most recent two years, stopped at about seven times the funds over the past seven years.
I think the best approach is to combine an EA that performs well over 10 to 20 years with Super Recovery as a portfolio strategy.
It might also be worth considering a portfolio that pairs Super Recovery with high-risk, large-trend reversal EAs such as grid or Martingale types.
See you again.
