To increase capital through mechanical operations, it must be market-responsive.

To increase capital with mechanical actions

It must be market-responsive

Trade based on price trends rather than looking at ranges

Repeating increases and decreases is only natural

Since martingale is like cutting losses as well

In the market, the thing that "there will certainly be a moment of profit" is the Holy Grail

And if you cannot grasp it by numbers or logic bets, it cannot be called the Holy Grail

In other words, when you trade, it must be a plan that inevitably increases

This means you can make a perfect logical bet on the price movement strategy

That is the Holy Grail

Moreover, in probabilistic thinking

There is a reflex system and a deliberation system

If there are times when you must switch to the deliberation system

I think it would be fine to take a break

Because the reflex system will come again

The market movements are not so much

If you bet on the logic and “there will certainly be profit途中で” the Holy Grail’s trick

Even if you’re watching the market continuously, as long as you’re making profit it increases

The Deliberation System itself is a mental argument

Basically, only the reflex system is the mechanism of capital increase

The market simply moves up or down

By adjusting profits with numerical up and down in that strength, you make it so that “there will certainly be profit途中で”

Being too mechanical leads to losses

It is better to have a somewhat approximate system

If you’re going to average in,

There is a good reason to pyramid with hedging

The logic of averaging itself

Is to make a profit and exit when losses occur

It isn’t a logic based on profit while it’s profitable

A logic based on profits while profitable

Becomes a one-way profit hunt; doing it in one shot is the premise of profit logic

In averaging,

Whether the price goes up or down, you’re aiming for profits, but the risk only rises

So it’s the opposite of profit-based logic

It’s better to hedge with hedging averaging and pyramiding to offset and aim for profit

Win rate is

↓

↑

Higher

Profit rate is

↑

↓

Higher

Pyramid averaging with hedging against the trend

Add in Dalambet (Dalambier) there as well

Win rate is

↓

↑

Higher

Nandip Dalambet is ideal

Profit rate is

↑

↓

Higher

Pyramiding should reduce the lot size

The basic structure is one-shot Dalambet

There is no fair value in the market

The basic structure is to switch early

Switch between up and down

End at the third time

After that, switch averaging

And then proceed to realize profits

Check the market with a grid

If you cannot increase through that grid’s interactions

There is no Holy Grail

The Holy Grail is

Only an answer that exists within the profit rate

Only a one-shot trade would become the Holy Grail

Holy Grail = appropriate one-shot trade

Not expecting absolute ups and downs in the market is the Holy Grail of capital increase

Therefore, Forex Street continuing to increase by using strategies like 1:1 range and 1:2 trend is just that

Averaging

1→2→3→

Pyramiding

4→3→2→1→1

If it retraces, average in

If it advances, pyramid

A reversal proceeds as Dalambet

3

↓

4→5→6

Like this

Choose brokers with small spreads

Large spreads require more time

Hedging Averaging up with Dalambet and reducing with Dalambet pyramiding

Reversal one-shot Dalambet

Decide whether to reduce waiting time or keep it short

Don’t place trailing stops in the trend-following pyramid

1 = initial position; 2 = next position, not the lot size

1→2→3→4

If the pyramid returns to 1, cut losses (take profit on averaging)

Continue in the same manner; eventually profits will simply increase

One shot

＋9

Trend-following Pyramid

Compared to losses, it differs by about four times

Dalambet will lose if you miss timing even once

So you must have a logic that can achieve a winning streak, or you won’t profit

If you place hedges with horizontal lines and averaging, you’ll lose

If you place pyramids, you won’t win because

whether you’re holding a flush or not

Holding long-term becomes the trigger to increase

The idea that you’ll win by averaging is

“It means you can keep increasing forever”

This is not a plausible thought in the market

Then if you do the opposite pyramid, you’ll win

But “simply pyramid and you’ll just lose”

Because you’re not countering the loss-inducing indicators with averaging

In Martingale theory

It’s about the reverse Martingale of 10 consecutive wins or more

In other words, you’re not leaving the pyramids as they are

Not imposing limits is the secret to increasing