Explain the reasons why time-based waiting trades are recommended

Time waiting: wait at least 12 hours before starting the market

There is no absolute in trading

There is no such thing as a fair price in the market

It’s the same wherever you trade

Why you wait for time

Because the market won’t move

Why do contrarian trades lose?

If you hold the concept of contrarian trading, “there is no limit”

Therefore, you keep trading because contrarian trades don’t become established

So only trend-following becomes the profitable method

You should perform capital increase efficiently

Contrarian trading is inefficient

Why would you lose but still win?

Because you leave it for one day after losing

If you leave it for one day, the game is usually reset

Therefore, live roulette is the same idea

If you can’t repeat that, you’ll lose

If repeated, anyone can increase

So I keep telling you to be able to increase

Being able to increase properly is the way to become a billionaire

If you can increase capital, starting from 1 yen, you can quickly reach 10 billion, no matter what

Darantel averaging (martingale) for contrarian is simply increasing risk by taking a break at higher-risk levels

Trend-following only requires careful choice of trading locations to increase

Focus only on capital increase; that’s all

In binary options, let the stop-loss be determined by the platform

In FX, let the stop-loss be handled by the stop

Leave everything to stop-loss, and then proceed properly

Use an approach of contrarian taking breaks and trend-following being cautious

There is a proper method to increase, and just follow that rule

Therefore, at such times other people are more than you need

Other people, society, the world, age — all are surplus; I’m just telling you not to pay attention to them

If only artificial intelligence progresses

If you have money, you can achieve immortality; do it for that

3

2

1

2

3

Normally, Danilnard averaging (D'Alembert) is better

Martingale averaging is only dangerous

To reduce risk and reproduce profits, D'Alembert martingale is best

Martingale has more profit, so you think losses can be offset

But the losses are large, so the risk is high

D'Alembert averaging allows you to increase or decrease while reducing risk

You should use a one-game reset type of D'Alembert averaging

Increasing profit only matters at the moment; only averaging in the direction

Averaging becomes irreparable because

You’ve increased too much; with D'Alembert averaging you won’t have increased that much

Even if you lose everything, it won’t be painful

The structure of capital increase is to increase

Increase with the logic you are best at, with the feeling of increasing

In binary ladder

Trend-following aim, or contrarian aim, or a mixed aim with averaging

In FX

Trend-following or contrarian

In trend-following or contrarian, it’s just about how you place your bets