If there is no "certainty," "perpetuity," "fixed-term," and "increase/decrease efficiency" in the market, it is not an equity increase.

Why Nanpin Trading is Good

Because you always trade and always make profits

It belongs to the school of probabilistic thinking

Because you continue many rounds in terms of negotiation and strategy

Waiting for time, etc., is only a cautious system

In the case of nanpin trading

it combines a reflex system and a deliberation system

In short, it is because you become strong at negotiation

I think that the true traders are those who can increase after practicing nanpin trading

because you can balance reflex and deliberation systems

the market itself is a chance market

the movements of the market itself are a chance market

Chance market = nanpin logic is no different

If the number of trades is not high, the chance-market logic is meaningless

With a logic similar to automatic trading, the profits will inevitably decrease

Because the market swings between highs and lows

You are just adding entries in the middle

Therefore, any entry that does not align with the market’s high/low will only be predetermined to be a stop-out

In other words

There is essentially a constraint that you must trade only within a fixed time

Even if you assume that market movements within that fixed time are “decided,” it is not an exaggeration

If you assume that, then “no matter how many times you increase your trade count, entries that do not align with the high/low will all be stopped out”

This also applies to live roulette

Even if you view roulette or forex as the market, movements like red–black consecutively cannot realistically occur often

However, those movements are usually contained within a certain range

In other words,

even if you drastically increase the number of trades

if there is no trend, it is meaningless; if entries do not align with highs/lows, you only get stop-outs

Because the market’s movements are already decided within a fixed range

In a situation where such movements are decided and there are not many big swings, you are simply trading in a futile way

Increasing trade count within a predetermined market is ridiculous

If it only increases unnecessary losses

You should consolidate your entries within a fixed time

Nanpin strategy / Pyramid strategy

Momentum strategy / Contrarian strategy

None of these trading logics are consolidated into entries within a fixed time

If the market doesn’t fit, stop-out continues

Therefore

If you don’t adopt Dow theory or breaks, in other words, fundamental-form trading logic, it’s meaningless

If you don’t enter only once within a fixed time, you can’t actually increase your holdings

That is,

In other words, low risk, middle risk, high return from a single entry within a fixed time

Fundamental-form logic such as Dow theory or break

Only these two logics truly support the action of “increasing in the market”

Otherwise, it just ends up being that you happened to match a movement within a fixed time, so you can’t actually increase

You just remain unable to increase

Why can you increase a single entry within a fixed time?

Because you have market recognition — market perception or market observation is essentially a consolidation of predictions

Therefore you observe only one entry, allowing you to rotate to the next turn

The mechanism for capital increase works very smoothly

Whether it’s forex or live roulette, the market is ultimately aggregated long-term

Therefore it becomes a one- to four-hour time-frame market making

Hence, a single entry within a fixed time plays a very important role and easily becomes the mechanism for capital increase

The logic of one entry within a fixed time itself

Is the logic that consolidates that aggregation

If you don’t operate with movement within a fixed time

It would be a trend-following logic, and the number of losses will only increase

Also, in the end, low risk high return wins

And since movements within a fixed time are already decided,

No matter how much you bet within that fixed time, it’s useless and just increases losses

Thus it cannot be a growth logic

You must adopt a fixed-time trade logic to escape this dilemma

This is the same with live roulette

It takes time for a trend to emerge

Only stop-outs are certain, and the trend will rise as expected

These two are what form the Pyramid strategy

With a pyramid stop-loss in place, you can see surprisingly poor winning results

Also, if you are going to use a pyramid strategy

It is more important to place the pyramid portion as a single shot

Low risk, high return can be a holy grail, but

Even if you keep adding low-risk, high-return entries, you won’t necessarily profit

In reality, as you add, the stop-outs are determined

What you are betting on is “the market”

If you try to profit, you will lose

Why you lose is because “movement within a fixed time is already decided”

Because it is decided, “one entry within the fixed time is the mechanism of capital increase”

Furthermore, even if you adopt fundamental-form logic

you will be astonishingly unsuccessful

When deception occurs, starting from a negative logic because you are influenced by the long-term market

Therefore, with fundamental-form logic

unless you incorporate many fundamental conditions, the market will not move as fundamental says

Dow theory, etc., unless the trader’s expectations align

It does not function; it merely mirrors the same movement by chance

That chance is truly random, so it is meaningless

Unless there is certainty in the market, eternity, a fixed period, and throughput efficiency, it is not capital increase

It must appear in the market

You must be able to profit eternally from the market

The market must appear within a fixed period

The throughput efficiency should be moderate, and you should be able to increase your holdings

Only with this can capital increase occur

Here

If you add the phrase “movement of the market within a fixed time is already decided,” you’ll understand

In the market, carefulness is unnecessary

You should conceive capital increase via a fixed-time trade strategy with a low risk and middle risk, high return

Trades without stop loss

Unlimited profit and loss settings

When nanpin is added to this,

If the profit is 100 and the loss is 200 when the infinite value is set to 100

If you keep adding nanpin, it becomes the same; the Pyramid strategy is the same