Towards a spiral leading to low risk and high return

The concept of a range does not exist

In the market there is no range

What is called a range is only a sideways trend

If you believe in the range

You will be ruled by the range

If you trade in a range and fail

You will only be able to believe in horizontal movement

You will only be able to believe in a stair-step trend

The trend simply becomes horizontal or angled

The market does not move because of price struggles

It moves according to the relative weight of those factors

In reality, price resistance and support are fragile

To get on track, you must keep in mind the fundamental idea that price is in a trend

The head is the top and bottom

The initial move is like a tail; depending on the market movement, it becomes the body

There is still risk that the market will move

Therefore it is better to specialize only in capital increases

Consider from the perspective of head, body, tail and translate into trading

If you repeatedly enter trades, the number of losses will increase and you will lose

If you want to increase the number of trades

It is recommended not to use a stop loss

The reason is

Whether you use averaging down or pyramiding

If you elevate that as a logic to a stop loss

The number of stop losses will reliably convert into profits

So placing a stop loss means you must

reduce the number of trades

When trading in this way

“You don’t have to be cautious”

“Just reduce the number of trades”

That is the idea

If you want to increase the number of trades

Then it is completely

a Dalambor-type approach or a logic that innovates the stop loss

or trading without a stop loss

Low-risk, low-return stop losses will lose continuously even once

and become unrecoverable, so the logic is fragile

Low-risk, high-return trades that reduce the number of trades are more solid

Why aim for a low-risk, middle-to-high return with a stop loss

Because aiming for a low return with a stop loss has no usefulness in a 1:1 sense

You will quickly get caught in a martingale spiral

So if you are aiming for a low return, just do averaging down normally

If you are going to make a logic that aims for a trend on the long side

A 12-hour waiting reservation trade is the most appropriate

Reservation trades can accumulate more when a trend appears

By waiting 12 hours, you can dramatically reduce trade count and increase opportunities for ups and downs

Dalambert can be managed without losing, but

Once a long losing streak starts

Then losses continue and funds run out

After a certain length of losing streak, you cannot recover

Roulette and stop losses share the same idea

Dalambert is not much different from averaging down

If you don’t use a stop loss, it follows the same logic

Then you must accumulate profits somehow with averaging down

Stop-loss reservation trades

Time waiting allows at most two entries

Because even with time waiting, the market won’t move in the direction you expect

If you keep trading as is, you’ll lose as much as averaging down and stop losses

The only trading style that wins with stop loss is entering two times or fewer during time waiting

Otherwise, too many entries will make profits and losses unbearable, leading to losses

Other than stop loss, the only trading method is averaging down

On the long side, you will lose first; with a long Dalambert you’ll end up waiting for the trend to come

High-return profits from long-side logic should be done only by automated trading

Automated trading logic

Logic to chase the trend to the end on the long side

(A logic that continuously enters while placing stop losses on the long-side)

Reverse-entry logic does not work unless it is timeless

Box-break type trend-seeking logic

All of it is trend-following

Automated trading

1) A long-side logic that continuously places stop losses and stays against the trend until the end

2) Box-break type trend-seeking logic

3) Envelope long-side, Williams long-side

Manual stop loss

1) Reservation trade up to two entries in a 12-hour wait

Basically only reservation trades; the reservation location can be read in range in other related currencies

If you can increase by repeatedly using stop losses, everyone would increase

Stop losses are mainly for automated trading or manual trading (endlessly reservation trades)

Discretionary trading is ultimately easier to profit from when done as reservations

Discretionary trading mainly decides at the end whether to cut losses

With automated trading

Only 1:1 endless logic like forex street increases

Otherwise only simple 4-hour trend-following is profitable

Other than that, manual confirmation of breakouts is the only profitable option

1

Pyramid-type strategies only work manually and are designed not to be feasible automatically

If you think about a pursuing type, it is long-side box-break; that is all

There is only the 4-hour long-side (not stop loss, but trend-following on the move) (only envelope or Williams)

Williams moving trend-following

Manual trading

1) Look at the currency pair related in the 12-hour wait and place a reservation trade within the range

2) Box-break to the trend end

Automated trading

3) 4-hour Williams moving trend-following

4) Forex Wall Street

These four only

Otherwise it is almost indistinguishable from discretionary trading, so averaging down is preferable

The market moves from where price is

In the end

There are only two methods: reservation trades in a 12-hour wait and long-side box-breaks; that is all

The market is

Range-type trend following

Trend break, range break

Vertical trend

That’s all; do not chase anything else; only target when that pattern appears