Explain why momentum trading is effective with a spiral
The market is not absolute, after all
So you should profit from averaging down
Contrarian averaging down or pyramiding with trend following is the only way to profit
Because the market keeps reversing
Time waiting + reserved trades
They are logics to make the market absolute, to cover the market and increase wealth
If you think the market is absolute
Time waiting + reserved trades
If you think the market is not absolute
Contrarian averaging down or trend-following pyramids
Contrarian averaging down or trend-following pyramids are the only winning options
They don’t increase much
You realize that profit comes from contrarian or averaging down, and you realize
In the end you will keep losing; that is why time is wasted
So you should do trend-following pyramids
Why do you deny contrarian averaging down so much
Why do you support trend-following pyramids
Because you’ll understand once you try the market
If you will eventually lose, you’ll realize you can increase with proper trades
Above all, trend-following pyramids are “trades that admit losses,” so they will grow
No matter how much you lose, as long as you “properly cut losses,” they will grow
The more you think about profit, the more you will lose
Better to focus on increasing wealth
Trend-following pyramids or time waiting reserved trades
These are the only things you should do
Only trades that will inevitably grow in the end will increase wealth
To become proficient, only trend-following pyramids
If you don’t trade in a way that suits you, you will not grow at all
If contrarian trading is ultimately unacceptable, you should not do it
Binary options too
A quick, responsive logic of averaging down/martingale once or twice is essential
1, 2, 4
It’s just 3 or 7
It’s clear that one averaging-down is enough
If you seek stability and losses mount, your equity will trend downward
If you seek profitability, you will find it harder to win
In averaging-down/martingale, only the first time matters
Both martingale and anti-martingale end in one sequence, with stability and profitability converged
Because it’s 1, 2, it only becomes 3 sets
If the market doesn’t return with one averaging-down, you should recognize you were wrong
That makes it more efficient
A averaging-down can save profits, but if you get dragged, it’s over
Considering capital expansion
A single averaging-down martingale, and then cut losses quickly for far greater efficiency
After all, martingale or anti-martingale rarely succeed quickly
It’s far more efficient to design a logic that increases by two steps
Infinite martingale or anti-martingale five wins in a row is only a theoretical story
If you average down in the market, do it for one round; if it doesn’t return, acknowledge you were wrong
Binary options only allow one averaging-down martingale
Assuming you will lose ← martingale
Assuming you will win ← anti-martingale
At that point, it isn’t capital expansion
Only one round of averaging-down
Martingale and anti-martingale logic are only one sequence
The market is either trend-following pyramids or time waiting reserved trades or one-round averaging-down trades
Ladder
Direction of one-round averaging-down trade
Hi-Lo
One-round anti-trend
Continuous trend-following
FX
Pyramiding in trend-following
Time waiting + reserved trades
This is how you increase wealth
If averaging-down or martingale cannot be bound by settings, you will lose
Therefore you should only do about one round; everything else is meaningless
Continuous trend-following is possible in a trending market, but
If you do it contrarian, you cannot admit a loss
Therefore, in the end
There will be only trend-following pyramids and time waiting + reserved trades
I don’t need a survival logic based on a hypothetical “what if”
Only logic that focuses on increasing wealth
Both trend-following and contrarian are simply
A loss when the market reverses
Do not believe that pattern
Therefore trend-following is easier to re-enter trades while waiting for time
One round of averaging-down martingale plus time waiting
Trend-following pyramids + time waiting
I won’t leave averaging-down as is; some people can increase wealth that way, but
Few can increase wealth that way; if you could, you’d already be a billionaire
You should ensure it will never be a passive hold; make it a fast, agile trade
That’s why
Only one round of averaging-down martingale
And it’s just the profit-maintaining of trend-following pyramids