When thinking in terms of roulette, the logic for FX capital increase also becomes visible

FX is

short-term only increases capital through anti-Martingale logic

short-term cannot go against mid- to long-term, so ultimately there is no risk-to-reward

Short-term: anti-Martingale

Mid-term: wait for time + reserved trades

Mid-term: trend following

Trend following always leads to losses if done all the time

In the end you win, but when offset, you are losing

For that reason, only trend-following when it is appropriate

If you replace it with roulette

Anti-Martingale is a 1:1 logic

Mid-term: continuous placement

Mid-term always waits for time

In the structure of increasing capital, a payout of 2x is only profitable with anti-Martingale, Martingale, or continuous placement

All profitable methods in binary options operate within these three logics

Risk to reward

The concept of converting to low risk, middle return, high return

If you do not adopt that logic

It’s important to remember that you will be constantly gambling

To make it capitalized

You must erase memories of past losses

Memory erasure is necessary; from there, replace all with memories of the capital-raising logic

Being 1:1 is not profitable unless you use anti-Martingale

Continuous placement in a market where trend following works

Continuous placement in a market where counter-trend works

There is no other way to increase

There is no Holy Grail in the market

There is no Holy Grail in binary options

The market was simply a market that tended to return near expiration in a timely manner

That nearing-expiration trade itself is not a holy grail

It’s better to realize that the market exists and is just manifesting it

Everything is just timing, and it is not predetermined

Profit does not create anything; such things do not exist

We don’t need that; increase properly

That is all; just focus on capital-raising