Discretion is a trade that follows randomness
Discretion is trading in the direction and against it
Its structure is randomness
If it is not random, then it is pattern
Discretion is
1. Randomness of alternating trend-following and counter-trend
2. Pattern of trend-following focus or counter-trend focus
3. Pattern of alternating trend-following and counter-trend
Randomness or pattern
In roulette, the pattern ends depending on the house edge
Pattern of trend-following focus and pattern of counter-trend focus, or alternating trend-following and counter-trend pattern, cannot be increased unless there is repetition
Only chasing with trend-following or only counter-trending yields the highest win rate and tends to decline
Randomness is about waiting time and number selection by randomness, so you just keep losing to randomness
Wins or losses are random, but there is no advantage there
If it is not a logic that can increase with pattern
It cannot be a capital-increase logic
FX is the same, increasing only with pattern
Things to consider in roulette
A fixed pattern logic loses
Suppose there is a pattern logic like red-red black-black
As a result of doing that
If it is black-black red-red, it loses four times
If red-black red-black, it is a draw
If black-red red-red, it loses twice
You cannot make profitable trades
To do something about this, only consecutive trend-following remains
Not by following with trend, but by continuing trend-following consecutively
In binary options, it is less about an ironclad rule
Due to binary characteristics, contrarian can be effective in certain markets, but
In roulette, there is no market where contrarian is effective
Thinking about contrarian in roulette leads to losses due to reversals
Because contrarian tends to lose
Only a method of continuously entering the same region yields profit
When considering Black-Red strategies
There is no way to profit by alternating pattern-like chasing
Roulette is theoretically random on paper
In reality, it may be rigged, or random, or the house edge, all intertwined
Considering that, it becomes clear that pattern-like chasing is extremely risky
Therefore, the most appropriate is something like increasing wins through continuous staking
In video roulette, whether you chase a pattern or continue staking, you cannot profit
To succeed in capital increase
You must use a pattern that leads to capital increase
In roulette, that just means continuous staking
If this is an alternating pattern, it is only randomness, so for capital increase it is "impossible"
Continuous staking is comparable to capital increase because
It is not random, whereas alternating patterns are purely random in consciousness
Continuous staking is not random; it is a proven pattern of increase visible in the past
With alternating patterns, you cannot even tell where they are effective
Because you cannot neatly align that alternating pattern
There are markets that prosper merely by continuous staking in dozens and columns
Only basing on such times makes capital increase surprisingly profitable
There is no need to employ any techniques
What you want is
The mechanism of capital increase
The logic of capital increase
The pattern of capital increase
The rules of capital increase
Only
