Any method to win is fine—the Holy Grail

There are people who win with a one-shot reversal

You should do a one-shot close to averaging down

Enter after waiting 15 minutes

Start with funds considering a high-leverage broker

Starting with 100,000 yen is not essential

Only whether funds increase by a certain percentage in a week or whether you can increase capital matters

Even if it’s 1,000 yen, think of it as 10,000

Technical analysis is effective when short-term indicators are overrepresented; the longer the time frame, the more disadvantageous it becomes

↑

On a 1-minute chart the opposite is true; the longer the time frame, the more favorable the short-term indicators are

It moves around the center with a mid-term focus

There is short-term momentum and long-term trends in movement

Short-term time frame

Long-term indicators

Medium-term time frame

Short-term, medium-term, and long-term

Long-term time frame

Short-term indicators

Putting technical analysis in causes confusion

Only relying on one分析 is meaningless

The time frame on which a single analysis is applicable is the effective time frame

Chaos theory and recursion theory show that

Only short-term predictions can be made

Therefore, short-term indicators are the best

Considering the market, that is certainly true

If you stay with 5MA, you only move forward candle by candle

A psychopath profits because they don’t consider gain or loss

I think it’s because they lack emotional pain

In a contracted chart, MA leads between short and mid-term

Support/Resistance works regardless of it

Large movements are driven by short-term momentum

If you would profit from chaos theory, you would not

If you think you’ll profit, go ahead—it's garbage

More than chaos theory, it’s like quantum theory

Quantum = ambiguity

There’s nothing to rely on except momentum feel or atmosphere

You can only make short-term predictions, and even those can miss

There are countless timeframes such as 1-minute, 30-second, 1-second charts

They move in complex ways; basically, prediction is impossible

In the end, you can only sense the current momentum, feel, and wave patterns that are ambiguous

You can’t quantify them precisely

Prices carry past prices

Analyzing that has no meaning

At the core of analysis, support/resistance functions as a mechanical device

Support/Resistance = trend, range, horizontal, and angle lines

There is a theory (Dow theory) conceived to pattern-recognize the complicated movements

There is a conscious theory to pattern-recognize the wave-like ambiguity

Everything exists to consciously systematize irreversible, complex, and unclear ambiguity at a recognition level

And whether they function depends on the market

Even if there is a mechanical device in the market, there is no moving mechanism

In fact, it’s like Pandora’s box—though the meaning differs, the contents are the same; that’s the market

There is no correct answer for a time frame

There is no correct answer for scale of magnification

There is no correct answer for short-, mid-, or long-term

There is no correct answer for analysis

There is no correct answer for optimization

Short-term predictions are simply more likely to be right

And it’s just a mechanism that happened to be correct by chance

Market shapes differ by time frame

Therefore, because a pattern is the most characteristic in this analysis, you should not take it as "absolute" or you’ll deviate from that pattern

And after the pattern has formed, you end up looking at the market and thinking, “Ah, this is that pattern.”

Then you label that formed market with Dow theory or patterns

Besides, just gambling like a game of dice won’t lead to profits

↑

There are cases where profit is higher than loss when you do it yourself; there are times when it goes well

“There is no logic that yields profit better than choosing yourself.”

↑

There is nothing as wonderful a logic as this

profit didn’t come from the market moving exactly as Dow theory

Profit came simply because the entry direction moved in your favor

What matters here is

It’s not the entry itself, nor the timing of entry

Only loss cutting and profit are important

Entry is not important; timing of entry is not important

Loss-cutting is important; timing of loss-cutting is important

Profit is important; timing of profit is important

What you must constantly decide is

Only the aspects of loss-cutting and profit

Profit wasn’t elevated merely because of averaging down

The market moved in the entry direction, which is the correct explanation

If it moves in the opposite direction, you’ll be stopped out

Aiming that “averaging down is a profitable logic” is not correct

It was only because it moved in the entry direction that you happened to profit

Unless you strictly cut losses, any logic becomes worthless

Prices don’t rise just because they look like they will

Prices don’t fall just because they look like they will

A rising pattern doesn’t guarantee it will rise

A falling pattern doesn’t guarantee it will fall

Analysis doesn’t guarantee it will rise

Analysis doesn’t guarantee it will fall

Any pattern or theory or analysis is fragile and can collapse at any time

Patterns, theories, and analysis are almost non-existent

From the perspective of whether you can trust the entry direction

Averaging down is a logic based on a return hypothesis, so if it doesn’t return, it’s over

Whether it moves up or down, you must be able to add to buys or sells

In other words, trade using horizontal lines and angle lines for support and resistance

Starting from 1-minute and 5-minute charts

MA or the envelope is essential

You won’t profit unless you mostly employ single-entry averaging down

Cut losses and take profits

Averaging down is acceptable, but do not cut losses

Basically, you should average down with a single-entry mindset

This is all there is

Strictly cut losses = enforce direction recognition

Loss-cutting = not a full liquidation but continue single-entry averaging down

Full liquidation = exit or close positions; take a 12-hour break

What chaos theory and recursion theory say

“There is no absolute in the market”

Because there is no absolute in the market, loss-cutting is not absolute

Because there is no absolute in the market, you must not put all funds in one account

There is no absolute in the market, but that is the key

Only hold logic that could become chaotic in this sense

There is no absolute in the market, so technical analysis is useless

There is no absolute in the market, so only direction matters

Whether it moves forward or not, Dow theory and waves become important

Because of the uncertainty principle, it’s important to hold multiple funds

Because of the uncertainty principle, discard all gambling mentality

Do not fail to cut losses, but be painless about what happens when you do incur a loss

Eradicate psychological pain

Following a trend with MA leading, pursuing profits, and envelope around the tops and bottoms