Fixed loss, small loss, infinite profit or one-shot loss, infinite profit, infinite

Nampin (averaging down) creates an unrealistically large profit and loss when you lose,

so total profits cannot cover it; before you are in positive profit, losses appear and the losses expand again

Averaging-down trading

the intervals of losing when averaging down are surprisingly fast,

even if you cut losses at that time, because the losses are large, the total profit ends up accumulating more losses

that is the truth of averaging-down trading

only a single-shot trade is appropriate for the exchange

with a single-shot, both losses and profits can be kept constant

Trading is,

even if you decide small losses and large gains, you cannot win

if small losses are unlimited you can win

but since you cannot perform such unlimited-small-loss trades

you should trade with unlimited losses and unlimited gains

rather, I think unlimited-loss with no profit trades is for automated trading logic

In the case of averaging down, when you consider the result after a loss

the truth of averaging-down trading is small loss, large profit

with a single-shot trade you decide both the stop-loss and take-profit yourself

the best is to engage in unlimited-loss with unlimited-profit trading

As a method of winning,

there are only two options: fixed loss with unlimited-small-profit, or a single-shot with unlimited-loss and unlimited-profit

Why is the single-shot with unlimited-loss and unlimited-profit better?

For example, when you know the direction of the market,

if you fixed the loss, when the market moves in your direction even a little against you, you realize the loss and miss the opportunity

if you set it to a single shot, and you think it’s moving against you, you can cut losses; if you think so, you can wait

In other words, with a single-shot, you can naturally adopt a trade of small loss and large gain