There is no old or new information

FX is like the uncertainty principle in quantum theory and like chaos theory in that the market is extremely ambiguous

the market is extremely vague

Indeed

the market has patterns

the market is faithful to support and resistance

the market is faithful to the patterns of trend (one-way) and range (horizontal or angled)

However, what actually forms

is a trend! → it was a range

pattern → it was support/resistance

and so on, to the point that there is no end to how “noisy” it is

noisy = ambiguous

Therefore,

there is no old or new information

Rather, they are temporary logics

It is important to have a style that has no obsolescence or fashion

To face the market positively

you must approach it with a long-term perspective

Whether to hesitate on exiting today or to pursue long-term capital increase

is the choice you face

Because the market is ambiguous

if you cut losses, it comes back

that’s what happens

However, that cut loss is a correct trade that doesn’t cause market madness

New information and old information share the same answer

Basically, it’s just whether the current market’s ambiguous movement is faithful to the logic or not faithful to the logic

In reality, what moves is not thanks to that information, but because of the market’s ambiguity

You might feel it’s like FX philosophy, but

In reality, the market is extremely close to gambling

In unseen places, there are unseen mechanisms

that cause the market to move

So the idea of “just don’t lose” is correct

When you think of gambling, you might recall pachinko or slots,

but poker is actually closer to market choices

When you read books by people who earned money from poker,

you’ll find decision-making that suits the market

It’s close to mental aspects

I think many people can develop a sense of market intuition

In fact, by just changing the trading logic, some people’s capital increases dramatically

“If you trade the same as now, you’ll achieve the same results”

is

because FX involves choosing amid ambiguity, it’s a valid statement