The translation of the provided HTML content to English is: FX Dragon Saint can write genuine personal information
------------------------------------------------
Empathy rate 99.9%!
What is the FX manga that’s all the rage now??
↓
------------------------------------------------
◆Introduction◆
I, Ryusei FX,
as needed,
publicly reveal real personal information.
People often ask about that.
“Why do you take such risks?”
and (^^;)
Since I receive many questions,
I’ll answer them here (laughs).
◆When running a newsletter and selling products, seller information must be disclosed◆
I run a newsletter and sell paid products within it.
At the point you sell paid products,under the Specified Commercial Transactions Act (S-CTA), you must disclose the seller's information in detail.
In my case, I’m not incorporated as a corporation and am a sole proprietor, so I have to expose personal information—that’s how it is (^^;)
If that’s how it must be, then so be it (laugh).
It’s not that I choose to reveal personal information, but
“it’s necessary, so I have to disclose it”
that’s what it is.
◆There are still people who list false names or virtual office addresses!◆
“Why does Ryusei-san publicly reveal personal information?”
For such questions,
“Because I’m selling paid products, I have to disclose under the S-CTA. I’m a sole proprietor, haha!”
That’s the only explanation I can give.
I’m just laughing by coincidence (laugh).
In subsequent questions, a common pattern is
“But many sellers use pseudonyms or a virtual office address for their products!”
This is a prompt.
“Please don’t lump me in with those scoundrels (laugh).”
and similar remarks.
Why is that so funny (laugh)?
◆Those who must use false names or virtual office addresses to survive◆
As I always say,FX information products are mostly shoddy, fraudulent at best.
The more luxurious and slick the sales page, the more suspicious it is.
With such products, of course there are endless complaints, and while it might stay only on the internet, if the company’s real address and personal information are exposed and customers come to shout,“fraudulent scammers”wouldn’t be pleased either.
That’s why some use false names or virtual offices.
At that point, there’s no sincerity as a seller who charges a price.
But think about it.
Selling a shoddy product with confidence shows there is no sincerity.
At that point, you cannot expect sincerity in the disclosure under the S-CTA (laugh).
◆Only because I sell decent products can I disclose personal information◆
I can disclose my personal information because I sell a truly decent product called BBP.
“I want to meet and hear explanations, I want a voice consultation first”
I readily accommodate such requests as well.
“FX product scammers”wouldn’t be able to do such things (laugh).
FX information products are a business that can enable malicious profit-making.
That’s why you must judge them carefully.
So the S-CTA disclosures may be a good benchmark.
Most sales companies are incorporated, but if that’s a virtual office, beware.
In reality, you can’t be certain the company actually exists at that address without visiting, but there are ways to investigate.
◆Products that are not necessarily malicious but close to that◆
If a product isn’t using false names or a virtual office, that doesn’t automatically make it high quality.
Even if there’s nothing wrong with the S-CTA disclosures, beware of products that are dangerously close to being malicious.
Even if a product has no solid justification, there are some that stay top through marketing strategies for years, even if the product itself isn’t strong.
We“No matter how poor the product, marketing can make it sell”, and thus it can be made to sell by arranging marketing in various ways.
Hmm.
Marketing is amazing (^^;)
- Top ranking on major ASP sales lists
- Recommended by numerous affiliates
- Sales letters are very thorough
With just these three conditions, naive beginners can be swayed (^^;)
These three points, in my view, are
“conditions of a suspicious product”
lol
I occasionally introduce other companies’ products in my newsletter, but that is a responsibility I carry.
I cannot recommend sloppy products.
And the products I do recommend typically meet the following criteria:
- Not listed in major ASP searches
- Only handleable by a limited number of affiliates
- Sales letters are shabby (pardon me)
Saying the third item, “sales letters are shabby,” is really rude, isn’t it (laugh).
Well, that includes my own product letters as well.
Conversely, it means you can win on product quality even without big advertising budgets.
The more you invest in the marketing part, the harsher the marketing tends to be.
Because the core product is weak, you have to win on the outer presentation,a showy display, and that’s the reality.
Even if you bought a top-ranked product from a major ASP, if you’re just being played in the above arena, it’s truly infuriating, isn’t it!
To avoid getting caught in odd products, it might be worth focusing on how FX information products are marketed.
◆Conclusion◆
From the discussion about the S-CTA disclosures, to the marketing realities surrounding FX information products, it’s all very important.
I believe that
“uneducated people end up losing”
in this world.
People buying products are also part of the marketing framework.
Therefore, taking a step back and studying the marketing structure itself is prudent to protect yourself.
