November 18 (Fri): S&P 500 (Free viewing item: Real traders' criteria)
Good evening?
I will introduce some of the comments I received?
“I thought Bollinger Bands couldn’t be used, but I was surprised to learn how useful this indicator can be!!!”
“Bollinger Bands are 깊다 deep, aren’t they? I’m struck by my own ignorance.”
“Bollinger Bands are so enjoyable.”
We’ve received a variety of such kind words?
It’s not that the indicator cannot be used; it’s that the user hasn’t mastered using it…
The same goes for methods and money management.
If you blindly trade based on sources from YouTubers whose sources you don’t even know, you’ll incur losses?
YouTubers just want views.
Analysts get paid for writing.
What merit is there in believing people who have not actually traded?
I see many people posting spectacular profits on Twitter, but…
That can be faked.
Criteria for judging whether someone is a real traderare as follows…
- Is there any inconsistency in what they say? ▶If there is consistency, then?
- Have they analyzed properly and suggested what kind of price movements might occur in the future? ▶If the reasoning is clear?
- Are they making definitive statements? ▶
- Do they view the market as win-or-lose? ▶
- Is the risk-reward ratio reasonable? ▶
- Do they reflect properly? Do they review their analyses? ▶
I can’t cover everything, but please look at these aspects.
Even people with more than 10,000 followers say questionable things, so please judge carefully for yourself!
Now, after about a week, let’s also take a look at the S&P 500.
（*Note: The following environment recognition is limited to members。）
