So I created a “structure that judgment cannot enter”
When I couldn't win in trading,
I always thought I lacked judgment.
I have to study more
I have to gain more experience
If I know more correct answers, I should win.
But at some point I realized.
The issue wasn't the quality of judgment.
Judgment itself
was breaking trading.
Judgment always comes with emotion
No matter how calm you intend to be,
- When profits rise
→ "Maybe I should keep going" - When it slightly goes against you
→ "It might return" - After a winning streak
→ "Today I feel I can win"
Like this,
Judgment always comes with emotion.
This isn’t a matter of talent or mental state.
It’s how humans are designed.
Reducing judgment didn't help
At first I thought.
- Increase the rules
- Make conditions stricter
- Add more check items
But the result was the same.
Judgment won't become zero.
Somewhere there is
"Is this time an exception?"
a margin left for doubt.
As long as that margin exists,
trading will inevitably crumble.
So I changed my approach
Not to manage judgment well, but
Not to make it easy either.
This is all I did.
Create a structure where judgment cannot enter.
- Where it ends is decided by the system
- If it trends, follow; if it collapses, end
- Wicks or emotions have no bearing
- Only look at the closing price
We do not provide a seat for human thinking from the start.
When you “eliminate” judgment, what happens
is something mysterious.
- You stop hesitating on take-profit
- You stop delaying stop-loss
- You stop wrestling with wins and losses
As a result
Trading becomes quiet.
The flair reduced, but
it stopped breaking down.
What textbooks didn’t teach
Textbooks say
- Make the right judgment
- Have a basis
- Stay calm
Yet the answer I reached was the complete opposite.
There is no such thing as the right judgment from the start.
What exists is
the structure that allows judgment to intrude or not.
Next episode teaser
Next, I’ll dig one level deeper into this.
What is it okay to fix?
Is it winning?
Is it the rules?
Or—
