FX is not “the military victorious when you win”
Only when winning, trust your discretion
Summary (the only part you need to read)
Discretion only looks correct when you win
・Most people trust discretion only when they win
・When you lose, you call it “the market was bad” or “this was an exception,” and the verification doesn’t hold
・If reproducibility is broken, continuing to win becomes impossible
・The OniSpeed AI is a mechanism to create the same judgment whether you win or lose
・When you lose, you call it “the market was bad” or “this was an exception,” and the verification doesn’t hold
・If reproducibility is broken, continuing to win becomes impossible
・The OniSpeed AI is a mechanism to create the same judgment whether you win or lose
When you win, you say this:
“After all, my judgment is correct.”
When you lose, you say this:
“The market was bad,” “This was an exception.”
…Looking at this evaluation criterion calmly,is dishonest.Indeed.
If you judge by results, nothing remains
Why does discretion become “correct in hindsight”
Discretion itself isn’t inherently bad.
The problem is that humans evaluate discretionby outcomes.
・When you win, you want to claim it as your own achievement
・When you lose, you want to blame external factors
・Therefore discretion is beautified as “correct” after a win
・When you lose, you want to blame external factors
・Therefore discretion is beautified as “correct” after a win
Discretion is beautified by outcomes
With discretion, verification cannot occur
This is the core.
Even on the same chart, judgments change depending on mood or fatigue of the day.
Then,reproducibilityvanishes.
What happens when reproducibility disappears
・Backtesting cannot be performed (even if possible, it’s meaningless)
・You can’t see improvements (the cause becomes “the judgment of that day”)
・With every loss, you end with “this was an exception”
・As a result, you endlessly repeat the same losses
・You can’t see improvements (the cause becomes “the judgment of that day”)
・With every loss, you end with “this was an exception”
・As a result, you endlessly repeat the same losses
Things that cannot be verified cannot be improved
Actually, winning trades are more dangerous
Winning trades feel good.
But winning is more dangerous.
Because a win leads tothought stoppage.
・Win does not equal correctness (anyone can occasionally win)
・The danger is that you cannot explain why you won
・A win that cannot be explained cannot be reproduced next time
・The danger is that you cannot explain why you won
・A win that cannot be explained cannot be reproduced next time
A win that cannot be explained is merely an accident
People who are ahead question their wins
People who are ahead are colder.
They don’t celebrate wins.
They look at “Why did I win?” and “Can it be reproduced?”
What people who are ahead do
・Validate winning trades
・Check the reasons for wins with numbers
・Eliminate unexplainable elements (discretion)
・Fix the decision criteria and remove variance
・Check the reasons for wins with numbers
・Eliminate unexplainable elements (discretion)
・Fix the decision criteria and remove variance
Those who cannot doubt their wins will inevitably lose
Onik speed AI does not misuse discretion
Roles are clearly divided
・Amplitude: Logic (entry)
・Sync: discretionary judgment after the market moves (exit)
・By separating judgments, decisions do not drift whether you win or lose
・MicroAI learns thousands of conditions automatically as the market changesin real time
・The learning resultsare automatically re-verified continuously(verification capability impossible for humans)
・Sync: discretionary judgment after the market moves (exit)
・By separating judgments, decisions do not drift whether you win or lose
・MicroAI learns thousands of conditions automatically as the market changesin real time
・The learning resultsare automatically re-verified continuously(verification capability impossible for humans)
Do not misuse the place where you apply discretion
There is no future in a discretion that you only trust when you are winning.
Can you apply the same judgment when you lose?
Wins that cannot be reproduced do not last.
Can you apply the same judgment when you lose?
Wins that cannot be reproduced do not last.
※ Investing involves risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
× ![]()