London_Premium

Have you ever had this kind of experience?

However, when you actually run the EA, you find that it does not generate profits as tested, but only losses, and even if it barely floats, it converges to a wobbly curve with PF=1.1 or so. You want to quit automated trading.

In fact, I have experienced this kind of thing more times than I can count, and I have found that the cause of this is that the developer, in order to make a logic that originally did not have much of an advantage look good and sell it, tried the parameters of the indicator in a round-robin fashion and, by making the values completely baseless based on consequentialism, overfitted the market in the past. The reason for this is that the developer has been overfitting the market by testing all the indicator parameters at random and setting them to values that are completely baseless in terms of results.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to spot these tricks just by looking at backtests on the buyer's side, so we recommend that you only buy EAs that have a long-term track record, or. We recommend that you buy only EAs from people you trust. In our work, we do not perform such meaningless optimization, and we take the time to thoroughly verify that the bare logic is a winning logic.

Simple logic that has kept the highest balances for over 20 years

In EAs, the time at which you trade is a critically important factor. I have released an EA called TOKYO PREMIUM that focuses on the middle market price, and as a result of researching the price movement of London time, I found that there is a certain law and that the price has been rising steadily for more than 20 years. (I would like to talk about it in detail, but please forgive me, as it will be counteracted by the emergence of many late EAs like MACHI.)

High expected gain, balanced risk reward

Many EAs on the market have abnormally deep SLs and abnormally small TPs. This pattern is also convenient for sellers because it gives the impression of a straight and steady rise until it loses, and it is convenient for buyers to think that it is the Holy Grail. This is because it is convenient for the seller to create a good backtest by identifying large losing trades and putting in place filters to avoid those trades. On the other hand, this EA does not use such deception, and the profit and loss are almost 1:1, at less than 30 pips each. As you can see when you create your own EA, it is quite difficult to achieve a PF of 1.3 or more with a risk reward of around 1:1 and simple logic alone.

As a test, try setting up your EA so that the average profit to loss ratio is about 1:1. Most of them will probably have a wobbly income/expense curve and a lower PF. And the forward test would probably have a PF of about that much.

On the other hand, the expected gain is also very important. For this EA, there is an expected gain of more than 4 pips, which allows the EA to remain profitable even if it is affected by a slight decrease in advantage and the spread of the real environment due to the generalization of the EA. If this one has only a little more than 1 pips, I will not name names, but it is possible that the dominance of the EA has decreased as more than a thousand EAs have been released in the market, and what had been stable and steadily rising over a long period of time has suddenly become an EA that keeps losing like a slippery slope.

However, please purchase with the understanding that this is not a chalice that can be won at any time.

Below are the revenues by year starting in 2020.

The year 2023 has not yet been finalized, but there are 20 years of winning years versus 4 years of losing years. It would be possible to sell the product as if it were the Holy Grail by making these four years positive, but we do not dare to do so. The reason for this is that if you actually estimate the drawdown and set the lot based on the results, the operator will suffer unscheduled losses. Have you ever purchased a product and thought you could definitely win with it, only to find that it had the largest DD in 20 years within a few months, and you had to put it away? In fact, the seller knows this beforehand and releases EAs, and I think it is a very big problem in this industry that many EAs have the stance that it is okay because they have made a profit from the sales. I do not optimize my EAs in a meaningless way, but rather I release them in a rough state, saying, "Please be prepared for this amount of DD.

However, we are confident in its robustness, and it has maintained a PF of over 1.3 for both 2000-2010 and post-2010, and unless this logic becomes widely known to the public and a large number of people make the same trades, we believe it is likely to continue to steadily increase over the span of several years. We believe that the logic is highly likely to continue to grow steadily over the next several years.

Price Revisions

As with the other EAs on display, these are the ones I actually use for my personal operations, so I will be revising the prices in stages to avoid losing market dominance due to the large number of users.

The price will be revised to 16800 yen for the first 3 days after the launch, and 3000 yen for every 30 bottles thereafter.