HLD_System

<Introduction.

It seems that many of the EAs on display at Gogojan are for short time frames.

Such a short timeframe EA is accompanied by a smooth, right-shouldered, good-looking backtest. Upon seeing it, you might think. "Could be the Holy Grail: ......" EAs with shorter time frames have a higher number of trades per day. And with a higher number of trades, you are more likely to benefit from compound interest, even if it is thin. With a little calculator, you can calculate the profit you might earn. If your initial margin was 100,000 yen, if you could win steadily at an average of 2% profit every day, you would have over 10 million in a year. Is such a thing really possible? As a general feeling, it is hard to believe that such a great thing is sold for only tens of thousands of yen. Somewhere in your heart, you know it. 　However, "EA" is not very common in the first place, and opportunities are hidden in places that don't get a lot of sunlight. 　If I had bought Bitcoin when no one was looking at it, I would be a millionaire by now. 　It may not be common, but there is no way you can be one of the winners if you are stuck in your common sensibilities. 　I was one step ahead of other traders by knowing about the "EA" trading method. 　Besides, the EA that caught my attention seems to have a good forward test, and real trades are available to the public. 　 The fact that there are so many buyers and the operation rate is high is proof that it is producing results.

But when it came time to purchase ...... The back-test results were good, but when I operated it, the results were not so good. When I operated it in my real account, I had losses that I didn't have in my demo account. （The result is at best a loss and at best a loss.) The back-test results were good, but the account started to decline steadily after 10 months of operation (even though the back-test results have been good for more than 10 years).

Do you have any idea what ...... is?

Actually, from a developer's point of view. The shorter timeframe EAs are easier to create beautiful backtests. However, it is a technology that is in a completely different realm than making a profit on a real account. I will say it outright. I believe that EAs with beautiful steady growth are selling a dream. There is no way that a system that can turn a small amount of money into 100 million yen in 10 years is sold for tens of thousands of yen, right? If you think "That's right," please cherish that feeling. It is said that only about 10% of all people are making a profit in the foreign exchange market, and 90% of them are having losses. Excluding those who can create their own EAs. I think that the number of people who are making profits with EAs is also less than 10% of the total.

Let me reiterate. EAs with short time frames, high-frequency trading, and good performance are dreams and illusions. There are some basics to trading with EAs. They are now the majority."Extreme EA."Don't be fooled by the If you can get a few trading EAs on the realistic track, you will gradually start to see profits. There are a few EAs on display at GogoJan that are doing well using more than one-hour time frames. There are some EAs that are doing well using more than 1 hour time frame. That is the realistic EA. *We have added a few to the QA at the bottom of the page, so please read it if you are interested. <About EA The concept of our EA is two-fold. EA operation should be easy to handle even for beginners. Fun to operate. We believe that fun is an important aspect of EA operation. In order to realize the above concepts We aim to fulfill the following requirements 1. to create a free version of the product so that users can try it out before purchasing it 2. allow a certain number of entries 3. the basic logic (core logic) must be made available to the public 4. the core logic should be simple and easy to understand 5. use the 1H leg or longer as the primary trading area 6. no more than one leg 7. To support multi-currencies. <Basic Logic This is the core basic logic. It is remarkably simple. Timing of operation The core logic is incredibly simple. Entry Conditions Long: Place a long stop loss at the highest price in the N period (specified by the parameter). (Short is the opposite).

■Settlement Conditions When a long position is held: When a new leg is created, the stop loss price is placed at the lowest price of the N period (specified by the parameter). (The opposite is true for short positions)

*What is disclosed is the core logic part of the trade. Various other sub-logics are also incorporated to stabilize the system. *You can add more conditions, but the number of trades will decrease. The backtests will be cleaner, but not as profitable. <Parameters ■3 positions in common Max_spread (Default value 15): Sets the maximum allowable spread in points. Max_slipage (initial value 5): Sets the maximum allowable slippage in points. Per position MagicNumber1 (initial value 000123): Magic number for the first position. Lot_1 (initial value 0.01): The lot number of the position for the first position High_Period1 (initial value 25): The stop loss period for the long position. 0 or less will disable the long entry. Low_Period1 (initial value 25): Stop-loss period for short positions. 0 or less will disable short entry. Buy_TP_Point1 (initial value 0): Set the long position's settlement limit (in points). 0 means no settlement limit is set. Sell_TP_Point1 (initial value 0): Settlement limit price (in points) for short positions. 0 means no settlement limit price is specified. Buy_SL_Point1_1 (initial value 250): Settlement stop-loss moving condition (in points) for a long position. Buy_SL_Point1_2 (initial value 50): Settlement stop-loss price range for long positions (in points) In addition to the normal trail, the stop loss can be moved above the open price if the price moves by a certain range. For example, if Buy_SL_Point1_1 is 250 and Buy_SL_Point1_2 is 50 If the market moves long 250 points (25 pips) from the open price, the stop loss is moved to the open price + 50 points (5 pips). If this works, you can escape with a small profit even if the market moves backwards in a short period of time. Sell_SL_Point1_1 (Default value 250): Stop loss move condition for closing a short position (in points) Sell_SL_Point1_2 (initial value 50): Short position closing stop price range (in points) *The above parameters are for short positions. ＜Other QA (Frequently Asked Questions) Is there any problem with the accuracy of the backtest with "only the opening price"? Since our EA operates at the timing when a new leg is created, there is no problem with accuracy even if only the opening price is used. If you are concerned about the accuracy, please try backtesting with the free version. How do I install the EA?　Does it work on Windows XX?　EA does not work. ...... etc. Please contact GogoJungle support if you have any questions about the environment. I will support any problems with HLD_System. Is it possible to limit trading to buy only (sell only)? Yes, it is possible to limit the number of trades by parameters. Are there any recommended currency pairs? We recommend the following 3 currency pairs: USDJPY, EURUSD, and EURJPY. Other currency pairs are also available. Are there any back tests for EURUSD and EURJPY? Please check below. Why are the parameters in points? There are no restrictions on currency pairs. Therefore, CFDs, which have been increasing recently, can be traded as long as they work with MT4. In this case, the pips unit is not so familiar to us, so we decided to use the points unit. Which brokerage firm do you recommend? We do not recommend any particular brokerage firm. We cannot answer about so-called foreign FX. Do you have any plans to upgrade the software in the future? If there are any problems or additional functions required, we will upgrade the software as needed.

*Addition on 8/30/2022 (I will add some questions I received that I thought were important.)

Please elaborate on "the shorter the time frame, the easier it is to create a beautiful backtest". For example, you can create a 5-minute EA with the following logic to create a steadily rising EA. 1. enter a backwardation when the deviation 2 band touches the Bollinger band period 25. Close when the opposite band is touched. 3. No buy entry when the band is below the moving average of period 200. 4. Do not enter to sell when the band is above the 200 period moving average. This may sound like a magic trick. The short time frame EAs that are generally available are adjusted versions of this type of logic. There are some differences, such as the use of RSI instead of Bollinger Bands, but the common denominator is "constant filtering. However, they all have one thing in common: they all use a certain filter and reverse the trend over a short period of time. There are several types of filters. Some use a moving average as described above, others limit the entry time (morning scan type), and so on. And by adding a trailing stop logic, the backtest can look even better. I know it's closed now, but in some international forums, EAs with good backtests like this were treated as some kind of toys. They were treated as a kind of toys. EA makers were playing with how to make the backtests better and more interesting. Personally, the most interesting EA was one that turned 100,000 yen into 100 million yen in one week. Moreover, this EA is profitable even with a spread of 10. By the way, the logic is surprisingly simple, and although some minor adjustments are necessary, it is as follows. When the ATR of the 1-minute leg exceeds 40, the forward entry is made. Settlement is by trailing stop. These are the only two points. I digressed, but of course I think it is good if EAs with short timeframes are also profitable. However, as a practical matter, it is difficult. In the EA creator's honest opinion, it is possible to make a profit with a short time frame EA, but it is not possible to make a profit with a short time frame EA because it is very sensitive. However, it is very sensitive, so constant maintenance at the program level is a prerequisite. In other words, you must be able to maintain your own EA at all times. This is an indispensable condition for competing in the short time frame. Therefore, I think it would be difficult to sell out at least in the form of selling out. Even if you can temporarily win with a real account, it will have a surprisingly short lifespan. For example, if the business model is to provide mirror trade services in the form of subscriptions, with the assumption that the main EA will be maintained by the developer at all times If the business model is such that the main EA is always maintained by the developer, I think there is a possibility of a win-win situation for both the developer and the user. (Although it would be treated as an investment advisory business, which may present other obstacles.) For the short time frame EAs on the market, it is possible to guess the logic inside by looking at the forwards (timing of trades and settlements). I think that there are many EAs on the market that you can guess the logic inside by looking at their forwards (timing of trades and settlements). At the same time, such things definitely cannot win in real account operations. As I mentioned in the main text, based on this background, I recommend EAs that use longer timeframes than 1H. The technique to make backtests go up steadily is not easy to use with more than 1H legs. In other words, EAs that produce results with more than 1H legs have a high possibility of being genuine. You may think, "EAs with 1H legs are not promising because the backtest results are so rattling. However, that is the reality of EA operation. But that is the reality of EA operation. We hope this will be of some help to you.