Should this chart be included? — Records of the "gap" seen through the rules [Issue 54]
Will you include this chart?
— Revealing the records of the “gap” through rules【55th edition】
GOLD｜July 29 verification – Effectiveness of a simple floating zone settlement
Monday, July 29, 2025 – Japan time 18:00–21:00
This time, we focused on the settlement-type evaluation of the “Sky Gap” logic in the floating zone (RR1:1).
Compared to traditional sky zone targets, it felt more like “a clearer trade,” and
in particular a pattern where profits are taken immediately after a stop loss was frequently observed, delivering the stability of short-term settlements.
⸻
Floating Zone（18:00–21:00) Results
• Total trades: 21
• Profit target achieved: 16
• Stop losses: 5
• Breakeven settlements: 0
• Total acquired pips: +87 pips
• Total lost pips: −62 pips
• Net result:＋25 pips
• Win rate: about 76% (16 wins / 21 trades)
• PF (Profit Factor): 1.40
Example of earnings (USD/JPY at 145)
• With 1 lot: +36,250円
• With 0.1 lot: +3,625円
⸻
A wider price range also increases losses
This floating-zone model uses fixed settlement RV1:1, and although the win rate is high,
in markets with large price swings, the negative pips per loss can be large.
As a result, since there were sequences of profit-taking after stop-losses that recovered, it ended positively, but
in a volatile market,the variations of acquired pips and lost pips can be large, so caution is needed.
⸻
Fixed RR-type trading feel
• Compared to “Sky Zone targeting,”the rules are simpler and judgments quicker.
• Because there are sequences of profit-taking after re-entry right after stop-loss,it’s easy to switch mindset.
• As a quick test/practice, this is extremely effective.
Effectiveness of fixed risk-reward trading
In “Sky Gap,” fixed RR-type trading forms the basis.
• Floating Zone (RR1:1)
• Aerial Zone (RR1:2)
• Sky Zone (RR1:3–5)
Adopting these fixed-RR types in the practice stage makes it easier to secure profits stably.
On the other hand, trades that maximize profits are the applied-trade examples published in “Investment Navigator+”.
By using both “Fundamentals: Fixed RR trades” and “Applications: Maximum profit trades” as two wheels, I felt that the reproducibility of rule-based trading is further enhanced.
⸻
“Sky Gap” is not a flashy strategy aiming for a single big reversal.
You accumulate small wins and ultimately stay in the positive
That stability is, above all, its greatest strength.
When using an EA, entries are automated,
and you can keep only monitoring settlements.
This is a major advantage for doing this while at work or managing chores.
⸻
Guide to the dedicated entry tool
For those who purchased Sky Gap,
we provide a supporting tool (automatic entry + stop-loss processing).
This was created out of a desire for everyday personal use,
and is designed to delegate break decisions and risk management according to market structure.
For those who mainly rely on their own judgment for take profits, this tool is well-suited.
However, if usage increases in the future, it may become paid.
The reason is that selling the tool alone may not suffice; there may be a need for support as part of a package.
＿＿＿＿
If you are considering purchasing, please feel free to contact us.
If you are interested in Sky Gap, you can join the online community
Join the online community here
In the online community, we cannot explain specific trade logic, but
you can participate in a “Chart critique community” that uses Sky Gap.
• If you send a chart image you’re curious about,
“What would have been the right decision in this moment?”
“Where were the entry and take-profit points?”,and we will provide feedback with rule-based judgments.
• Past charts from specific time periods are also OK.
We will respond in due course as time allows.
To you who are interested in Sky Gap
In short-term trading, build a foundation to judge with rules without hesitation —
that is the basic philosophy of Sky Gap.
Free教材 here:
▶︎Download “Tracks to the Gap”
In “Tracks to the Gap,” you’ll learn what kinds of moments you can actually trade in,
and the decision criteria are explained more clearly.
Compared to what was conveyed only on the sales page for “Sky Gap,”
the specific entry points and zone selection are also explained with diagrams and case-by-case details.
Even first-time readers will find it easy to reproduce, so
if you’re interested, please make use of it as well.
⸻
If you’re interested, please first receive the free material “Tracks to the Gap.”
From there, your first step in the Gap begins.
?When you’re unsure about whether to enter this chart,
I hope this serves as a hint to switch to thinking “judge by rules, not by instinct.”
Sky Gap
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/tools/ebooks/64393?via=toppage_recentViewed
