8/8 There is no need for an EA that buys on dips or sells on rallies.

FX automated trading, EA developersReiwa Double E is.

In my case,

I can usually understand other people's EA logic.

Then,

Actually, most commercial EAs are

trend-following or pullback selling EAs.

Among them,

if more similar EAs appear for sale,

the more you buy, the more losses occur at the same timing when they operate,

which is not good when considering a portfolio.

EAs for pullback buying and pullback selling

are the easiest logic for developers to create.

Therefore,

personally, I think no need for more of the same EAs to be released.

Originally, developers should

be at a level where they understand this kind of thing,

and if they understand it,

they should create logic other than pullback buying and pullback selling,

and if similar EAs exist, they will be buried within the sales sites

thus I believe there should be the will to develop even newer logic.

If we do not raise the level of EA developers,

it will not be good for users either.

In the first place,

if you keep real trade histories,

even if you release a new one now,

you cannot beat the length of real-trade histories,

so I think there's no point in releasing it.

So, with that in mind

I disclosed the pullback buying and pullback selling EA.

For users as well,

by disclosing the logic,

you can understand at what timing to enter,

so it will become much easier to handle.

With that,

Then!