2/17 An EA that is listed does not necessarily mean it is a good EA - No consideration! GogoJungle raises an issue! - Navi+ - GogoJungle | Auto Trading - Market Analysis

2/17 An EA that is listed does not necessarily mean it is a good EA

EA developer Reiwa no Double-1 is here.

More and more new EAs and EA developers are coming out.

Personally, I am thinking about the entire EA industry, so it is a welcome development.

As more EAs come out,

the portfolio effect increases just by that,

which allows for better EA management.

Narrow-minded EA developers sometimes have the mindset of

“my clients are being stolen,”

but

I would like you to think about increasing the number of EA users, not this “battle for a share of the pie.”

Now, this time

“Having an EA listed does not necessarily mean it is a good EA”

This is the story.

In short,

when an EA is listed for sale,

it means that the program is issue-free and entries are normal

and it will be approved for listing within 2–4 weeks, regardless of performance.

Therefore,

it does not mean “it was approved because it is excellent.”

There is no “evaluation of backtests or forward tests” in terms of listing screening.

Or more precisely, since I don’t know the exact criteria, it’s safest to assume there isn’t.

from the viewpoint of “listing screening,”

there are many things I want to tell Gogojan (the platform),

but I will write about them in detail later without sugarcoating.

Well then!

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【Reiwa no Double-1 EA Listing】

https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/users/112481/products

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【Reiwa no Double-1 Series Articles】

■ EA Beginner Course

■ No Sugarcoating! Gogojan Issue Proposal!

■ Double-1 FX Musings

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

【Reiwa no Double-1's Beliefs】

Develop EAs with a straightforward approach,

and gain the support of more people,

to maintain a long-lasting WIN-WIN relationship,

aiming to revitalize the EA market and raise literacy.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━