Consider EA and EA developers separately
I am the Reiwa Double-Eye, an EA developer.
An Expert Advisor (EA) is, needless to say, a tool that trades automatically.
Because it trades automatically, the mental aspect is eliminated,
and it will enter positions when entry conditions are met.
There are various logics in EAs, but
every EA developer has a distinct style or bias in their logic.
For example, there are commonly used technical indicators.
In such a context,
if you run only EAs from the same EA developer,
you may encounter stop-outs at the same time,
and the risk becomes skewed.
In that sense,
using EAs from more EA developers helps diversify risk,
even this alone contributes to risk diversification.
Even if an EA from a developer you don’t particularly like
can it be incorporated into a portfolio?
Can the EA be chosen based on objective data?
I believe this will impact operating performance.
However, I
will create EAs of various technical types.
I will challenge currencies and timeframes in various ways.
With that said, let us proceed.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
【Reiwa Double-Eye EA Listing】
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/users/112481/products
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
【Reiwa Double-Eye Serial Articles】
■ EA for Beginners
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/finance/navi/series/1700
■ No Hesitation! GoGoJungle Raises Issues!
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/finance/navi/series/1701
■ Double-Eye FX Chit-chat
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/finance/navi/series/610
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
【Reiwa Double-Eye's Beliefs】
Develop EAs by principled methods,
and gain the support of as many people as possible,
maintaining a long-lasting WIN-WIN relationship,
with the aim of revitalizing the EA market and improving literacy.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━