Infinite namping without adding conditions would be a treasure wasted

I don't feel like negating infinite averaging at all

because it can be used, it's versatile and easy to use

but this is only if you can avoid the risk

infinite averaging in other words is also about increasing losses infinitely

The market tends to move from trending to ranging and back to trending,

but in reality

it goes trending → noise market → noise market → noise market → small-trend market

like this

the ranging market is a noise market

the trending market has small, medium, and large trends

Even among them, the appeal of infinite averaging is

that in small- or medium-trend markets

you can profit without cutting losses

but this is the most troublesome part

in other words, if a large-trend market emerges

continuing infinite averaging becomes extremely dangerous

So you must decisively set stop-loss with infinite averaging

otherwise it won't be usable at all; you'll be sitting on a gold mine unused

It's better to remember the framework that there is a contrarian averaging assuming a noise market

and also keep in mind that the most dangerous market is the large-trend market

※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓