There are quite a few people whose continued losses are due to contrarian averaging down
The trend market itself has a characteristic flaw in that it does not occur over long periods,
so people ultimately return to mean-reversion averaging down (nampin).
While the mean-reversion nampin strategy itself has very high cost performance,
if you cannot cut losses in a trending market
that cost performance will become a lie.
In short, it risks becoming a purely theoretical argument.
If you cannot properly sublimates that risk,
mean-reversion nampin will become a cause of losses.
That is all that appears in the trading rankings.
FX ultimately remains favorable to trends.
This will never change.
Whether in automated trading or system trading (sistore),
even if you try to turn mean-reversion into a stable strategy,
you will eventually encounter curve fitting somewhere.
It is by no means stable.
What appears stably is precisely the trend market.
Range markets are noise before the trend market,
and the market is far more often a noise market.
On top of that, using mean-reversion nampin effectively is the most appropriate way to trade.
※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, click here ↓
× ![]()
