The strategy is said to revolve around defense rather than offense, but by focusing too much on defense, profits become neglected.
In market strategy, I think it’s better to specialize in defense rather than offense, indeed
since these strategies are in a set with trend-following, they only make sense that way
if this becomes contrarian, it becomes a weaker strategy for hedging risks
In the relationship between profits and losses
profits become extremely small
the market operates through numerous cycles and spirals, so
if you don’t properly arm your offense as well
you cannot respond to market changes
and if you stay too defensive, you end up not making profits
Even if you can profit from stock trading
there are people who can’t profit at all in FX
and those results are also born from the cyclical relationship of risk hedging
Losing is solely out of fear
to get over fear, a defense-focused strategy becomes necessary
However, a defense-focused approach makes a crucial proactive approach to the market fragile
With a fragile strategy, you won’t be able to handle the market’s approaches well
and as a result you end up losing more and more
If you think of this as a strategy for the market
you can see that it’s a weak strategy
In the end, trend-following tends to win
so you might think you should just follow the trend
but such markets only appear when conditions align
unless you trade with a balanced approach of both defense and offense, staying in a hold position,
you cannot derive universal results
because that is the trader’s own intentions
and that is the market’s reference axis
※ If you want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓
× ![]()