The idea of a contrarian index is meaningless unless it is logicalized

If you rely on the inverse indicator, you might win, but

there is no one who has effectively embodied it

Most of it is because you can only do “automatic trading type” trades

Discretion means “you can cut losses even if you don’t come back”

Many traders misinterpret discretion and waste it

That’s why cases arise where you can’t cut losses where you should

But if you fundamentally rethink the concept of discretion

you can actually learn to cut losses properly

In other words, traders

view discretion as technical or automatic trading

Information like that leaks into the inverse indicator

and you become extremely unable to win

You begin to distrust everything

Ultimately, your own foundation is gnawed away

To prevent that from happening

stop thinking of the discretionary part as mechanized

That would become a perfect inverse indicator

I think the inverse indicator is “non-technical fundamental analysis”

Because everyone relies mainly on technical indicator analysis

Even if you stop doing that, looking at the current technical market in a fundamental way becomes

a unique, irreplaceable piece of information

Just having that makes

the market’s adaptability higher

In reality, it isn’t mechanical trading

Mechanical trading is only possible in a “textbook-like market,”

and in markets outside the textbook later, discretion is required

That also means “adaptive capability of the market” is needed

That’s why

I’m telling you to have trading strategies that balance technical and fundamental analysis

※ If you want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓