There are no "loser group" traders; everyone is a loser group trader.
Basically, it's a contest of who is taller in the race to the top
No matter how much you argue, that comparison of heights will never change
Because there is no correct answer in the market
Since it is a theory of recursion
Any market can be proven by Dow Theory
Any market can be proven by support and resistance
All can be refuted with later interpretations
Interpretations made after the fact are not much different from those made beforehand
What can reproduce such trading is only trend-following technicals and fundamental analysis
Because, in the end, you constantly depict states that are not in the textbook
Often
We tend to try to separate trending markets from ranging markets
This is meaningless; it’s just a simplified depiction
In other words, voices that change states like high tone, low tone, modal voice, and falsetto
are no different from creating a term like “mixed voice”
But in reality, it isn’t
Technical market vs. fundamental market
will develop
Even more
textbook market (technical/fundamental) vs. textbook-crushing market (fundamental)
is
A fundamental market, both
Whether technical analysis works or not is the only question
That is why
Even with automated trading aiming for stable operation
even with diversified logic, when losses occur, all will experience drawdown
From the start, supporting technical analysis was a mistake
That’s why it’s said to resemble poker
In the end, fundamental markets and fundamental analysis become powerful
So, the universal analytical ability is
Fundamental analysis
Ultimately, mechanical analysis can be performed, but you will be mechanically defeated
To win with mechanical analysis
With mechanical analysis, you must understand the market’s direction
Technical markets are full of falsehoods from the start
※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓
× ![]()
