As long as we stay in the logic of maybe, we can't increase it

It is advised to stop the if-then scenario

This is similar to averaging down in market concepts

Averaging down is logically effective,

but you consider losses and gains of averaging down based on the strength of the “if-then” condition

That makes you more prone to bias

Even if you profit in the market, you may incur losses afterward in the market

You can make money, but at the same time, due to the expectation of losses during the “if-then” process

Because of that, your performance in the market worsens

In reality, most traders are not “bad at it”; rather, there is a greater tendency that they have talent

A trend-following approach is = a trade that a poor trader would do

Because they are poor, they exchange thinking only about the potential returns from trend-following

There is simply talent to increase from contrarian averaging down

If you can acquire the talent to “reduce losses,” that would be ideal

Most contrarian averaging down succeeds in increasing gains

If you haven’t increased, then you have set the return rate too low

To grow in the market

The profit range has to be large for it to matter

Trade while understanding temporary market tops and bottoms

Therefore, when it goes beyond the acceptable range, you need to consider whether to cut losses

That is where poker-like negotiation comes into play

The exchange there is not about luck

Naturally, what lies there is whether you “accept the loss” or “do not accept the loss”

Here, profits and losses begin to diverge

If this is a path of expanding losses, it means a proper stop-loss would have been appropriate

Profit would remain, you would avoid a painful loss by taking a risk and letting it pass

A major “what-if” in contrarian averaging down is

To illustrate, it is a negotiation scenario in such market conditions

And the differences arise because each operates under different logic

※ For those who want to keep earning with FX, click here ↓