Reasons why discretionary trading favors a averaging-down (napin) style
Thinking about Stop Loss
A trade that loses on a single entry and reverses
A trade that averages down (nampin)
If you do it this way
A single-entry reversal is
only profitable when a trend appears
and if you keep doing it, you’ll see a spread of losses that cannot be recovered quickly
However, with averaging down, there are many aspects that can save you and make it easier to profit
Basically, stop considering market conditions and adopt a nampin type
and judge the market’s momentum
Doing nampin in the Dumbbell style is hell
It takes days to win
Nampin is the downward movement until a trend appears
You’re only nampin to catch the market timing
In the end, it depends on the entry timing
Make the entry timing mechanical
Why a logic-variable type of trade is no good
Because market momentum changes constantly
Therefore,
Ultimately
It ends up as nampin type or time-wait type
Why market-varying nampin is no good
Because you don’t know where the market ends
The latent risk is too large
If you were to do it
Only the exit-type nampin
If you’re going to nampin,
you must restrict yourself to “counter-trend nampin” only
Entry timing, fundamentally, is all counter-trend
Counter-trend is effective
Nampin is basically
Just the idea that you could have effectively captured the counter-trend entry timing through nampin is what it is
Fundamentally, you should focus on “time-waiting to place a counter-trend setup or place an order”
Because market moves are unpredictable and tend to change
If you trade with discretion for a long time, you can only pursue with nampin in a counter-trend
Difference between nampin and a single-shot
If it recovers, you get profit immediately, that’s all
If the market doesn’t recover, you only incur losses
A single-shot setup has a faster turnover
Also, with discretionary nampin
There is a tendency to “return before profit is realized” and to “always have to fight”
Therefore, you get a distorted market view and excessive losses
Considering these, it’s better to trade with time-waiting
It is far more efficient than trend-following trades
Reasons why time-waiting for signals of 12 hours and 6 hours alternation is good
Markets typically move back and forth within about 3–6 hours at a time
To maintain entry timing and turnover, you must
target the action of “one round trip out of many rounds” rather than being swayed by every round
In other words, you must not be swayed by all reversals
To adapt to all reversals requires
you must change the market direction each time
That only distorts market sense and expands losses
That’s why there are traders who grow wealth with “only counter-trend nampin” trades
In reality, aiming for a low-risk, high-return setup that targets just one of several attempts among a few rounds leads to faster turnover
Meaning of counter-trend nampin and meaning of the speed of turnover in time-waiting models
These exist, which is why capital increases
※ If you want to keep making money with FX, go here
× ![]()