Stop-loss type and reset type trade logic
Wave-driven specialization: one-shot averaging up
This is what I do
I have conquered the market entirely
Even if I lose, I have the confidence to grow
Recommended trades
1. Stable trade logic with stop-loss trades to reliably grow; investment-style capital increases
2. Profit-seeking trade logic; move funds between accounts to reset as a reset trade
The market is a accumulation of waves
Therefore, a stop-loss trade that only targets market waves is the most profitable
What everyone struggles with in trading
“Direction change”
In other words, it means you can increase with stop losses and averaging in range trading
The market that is most difficult
is a mediocre market that neither ranges nor trends
Conversely, you can increase in such times with averaging trades
With averaging trades
Range
Mediocre market
Can handle either
However, in markets that do not return, you are at a severe disadvantage
Range
Small loss
Mediocre market
Average loss with averaging
Trend
Small loss
Accurate trades are no different from automated trading
If you want to increase through trading, don’t seek precise trades
In other words
It means you should not trade with an accurate market sense
In other words
Do not go long where you should not long; go long where a trend is not successful
A strategy that goes long where it should not is chosen
Stop-turn averaging is appropriate, but
that is because a trend will appear, so it should not be averaging in that case
Better to cut losses and reset
Do not seek regularities in the market; that is necessary
Do not seek waves or patterns
Dow Theory and support/resistance follow-break may be established, but not necessarily
Basically, you should not seek anything; just continue cutting losses and taking profits
Stop-loss trades are
market targeting with average-loss
or
trend continuation with small losses
Only that works
Trading that seeks market regularities
is fully automated, and cannot increase well
Even the gained logic becomes unable to respond
In other words, regularties do not exist
It means trades based on regularities won’t grow
You should only trade based on market rules
Because there are no regularities, you should follow laws
A turning trade is regular, but
A turning trade with averaging is regular
A trade logic conceived by regularities
is still a result of market observation
However, since the market operates on rules
you will later realize that such a trading logic becomes trivial
Turning trades are regular
Only trend-targeting turning trades are regular
However, turning trades with averaging are regular
Because the direction of trading and the acquired value differ
Stop-loss trades can increase if a trend appears, but
they won’t increase if there is no trend
Range trading only works when it works
Thinking to make a rigorous trading logic
“I will never do stop-loss trading again
Averaging will lead to ruin
I will stop averaging trades
Twelve hours and three hours
Only do small-loss and mid-loss trades
Trade only in currencies; do not do others; time is wasted
Treat it as starting January with a starting 100,000
Only think about seriously increasing
Do not meddle with anyone’s assets
This way of thinking is the best
Reset everything
If there is no basis to increase
Everything becomes arbitrary
If you are good at randomness
You could increase through random-logic reorganization
If you are not good at randomness, you cannot increase first
Averaging will end up losing no matter how many times you think about it
Sure, there are moments when averaging saves you
There are also moments where stop-loss saves you
Conversely, moments where stop-loss does not save you
are situations where averaging is left unattended
In terms of all trading concepts
There is no trade that does not include stop-loss
Hone a method to increase by 10% weekly
Then you can increase a hundredfold
If you start with 100,000, you can reach 10 million in a year
If not satisfied, increase your risk
Don’t worry about the difference between 10 and 20
For now, keep increasing by 10% every month and every week
Do not disturb market perspective
Anyway, opportunity markets come around in trading
Trading logic is meaningless
As you trade, you are trading in an opportunity market
Manual stop losses have become the far more efficient option than stop-losses
Arby relies on Martingale
If you cannot grow with even bets, you’re just achieving results with Martingale
Support/Res, Trend, Range lines
RSI
Trend-following
Envelope deviation → MACD level values
2% trades are typical
If you reduce capital trying to take low-risk trades, your market sense will distort
Thus, practically, you won’t differ from a certain level of risk trading
Discretion
Change buying and selling based on market pace
↑
Eventually you lose to strength
Even with stop-loss and trend-following, you must increase in a way that wins
Averaging = extension of loss
Mid-loss = expansion of loss
Why am I talking about trend-following all the time
Stabilization of automated trading is
D'Alembert
Martingale
Trend
Counter-trend conditions
All are risk hedges
And that provides stability to the logic
But markets are not built on those risk hedges
In the end, they are crushed
And eventually trend-following increases
Without thinking and without looking to others
It’s better to ridicule and only follow trend-following
What we should do is
How to only use “trend-following” to “increase”
※For those who want to keep earning with FX, click here↓
× ![]()
