Increase profits in a market where averaging down is profitable by continuing to average down

Nampin-style market

A market where you can make money with averaging down, just keep averaging down

In a market where averaging down cannot make money, you simply continue averaging down in the direction of the trend

Averaging down = you won’t profit unless it returns

If the market is moving in your favor, leave it alone

What you’re doing itself isn’t wrong

However, there is no moment when losses are realized

But because it hasn’t been realized, you can amplify it

↑

That OCD-like discipline is everything

It appears that averaging down increases

Because you’re only looking at a staircase-style market, in reality, those who trial-and-error and trade by trial and error actually make more money

Once the market stops obeying the staircase, because you’re watching

You think you can trade in the trend direction when averaging down doesn’t work

Basically, the market state doesn’t change just because the form changes

The market exists in two states

Range-dominant

Trend-dominant

In a word

From the beginning

Neither a range market nor a trend market truly exists

In one word

It’s not the market but the predominance

Because you call it a market, you only lose

Averaging down itself

If you fix it to 1:1

It would be like 0.5:1 or thereabout

And you’re "hiding it somehow" with averaging down

This is almost the same mindset as scalping

Averaging down “hides the net change” that’s averaging down

Even so, it doesn’t increase the pyramid

If you want to trade cautiously, in the end you’ll end up with stop-loss trading

Better to time it and commit to stop-loss trading

Trading is

Just trade by aligning with the current market move

So instead of averaging down, reserve stop-loss is appropriate

If a trend emerges, you only need one entry within three hours for a trend correction

Anything else and you’ll just keep losing

Averaging down is just masking that with averaging down

In reality, when entry movements are appropriate, there’s no need for averaging down

The allure of averaging down lies in

While stop-loss waits in time, usually one entry is enough, but

Averaging down yields profit simply because the market returns regardless of intermediate failures

That pattern of profit during the meantime is the allure of averaging down

Stability is not something to seek

Even if you think losses should be cut when a trend-dominant market appears

That market will continue many times, and you’ll end up with no profit

Therefore, basically you should repeatedly switch directions or hedge and use nampin pyramiding heavily

To keep earning profits there

No matter what, averaging down will lose when a trend or a one-way move appears

There are levels where you can cut losses, and levels where you cannot

Averaging down = trading with zero-cut as the only option

Averaging down essentially has a stop-loss position level

You only cut through that at zero-cut

In effect, you’re averaging down up to the stop-loss and increasing with a reverse martingale pattern

Stop-loss

1) 12-hour range-waiting trade; 3-hour waiting for a trend entry

2) 3-hour wait choosing 1:1 and 1:2 while reverse martingale to +3 or more

Manual reversal

3) Averaging down using zero-cut; if you lose, take a day off

Trading both directions leads to losses

Simply going in one direction increases profits

If you’re going to pyramid, better to leave it alone from the start for higher profit

Whether using nampin or pyramid, leaving it alone sometimes yields profits

That many times offsets the profit, so only one shot minimizes risk

Anti-martingale must be mechanical and without discretion to be meaningful

Evenly spaced reserved trades are enough

Nampin family

Certainly there are times you multiply tenfold and do zero-cut operations

But that depends on the duration and

the market, so you can’t increase much

It's better to increase properly with normal reversal nampin

Essentially all long-term strategy logic becomes hypothetical

So you can only realistically increase with short-term reversal nampin

Repeat reversal nampin as you go

Reasons nampin strategy loses

Because you can’t cut losses in a trend

Because you misread reversals

Because you thought it was a trend, but it isn’t

Considering these, nampin

The idea of trading when nampin doesn’t save you becomes a theoretical abstraction

Simply because you can’t easily determine when a trend will occur

Also, simply reversing would be much safer from then on

Since you don’t know how the market will move

Trading by reversing as the market moves is more realistic

If you earn a little there

Losses are better than reversals

Nampin is not suited for reversals

When you should cut losses, cut losses

When you should reverse, reverse

Also

The results differ between trading with nampin and trading with market recognition

To trade what you studied in past markets or analyses

You can do so by trading with market recognition

Stair-step trading

Range trading

Wave trading

Automating them inevitably leads to losses

Markets generally have waves and movements,

All of this is due to price

So in the end, prices move

Plainly speaking, the market is

Not a 1-to-1 staircase, but a 1-to-10 staircase

Because the strength of the steps changes

None of the range-style trades will work

That is due to waves and patterns as described in Dow’s theory

Therefore although the market is a range,

The main movement comes from waves and patterns

Both trend and range appear in the market,

But waves and patterns dominate

So rather than aiming perfectly at the top and bottom with a range trade

A single-point buy on waves and patterns yields more profit

Because range trades seem to nicely hit the top and bottom, but in reality they can be messy and often fail due to waves and patterns

However with single-point buys on waves and patterns

Even if the market moves away, they often remain after the moves

Compared to trying to hit tops and bottoms with range trades

Considering where single-point buys of waves and patterns tend to increase,

In other words, such

Trading aligned with patterns that reflect market influence will increase profits

Remember and trade with flags and recognize them as waves to trade with the wave coefficient

By doing this, even if you nampin, it isn’t a range-trade, so it becomes meaningful

Waves and patterns

Trend-range switching trades

Reserved range-timing trades

Other than these, it won’t be trading

Must be a trade that can increase by repeating increases and decreases

With waves, patterns, Dow theory, and trend lines

Range trades only apply to the patterns that fit ranges

From mid-way, range-style becomes unusable

Because you’re nampin, you don’t understand the drawbacks of its versatility

Waves and patterns

Market does not move by support/resistance

Market doesn’t move by waves and patterns, but

Market movements are faithful to waves and patterns

If you consider this with support/resistance, you’ll lose

Counter-trend gets driven by waves

A pattern that goes beyond 100 pips with a return is

Just leaving it to the market, so it isn’t trading

In the end, nampin is a form of trading that tries to distinguish markets where it can survive from markets where it cannot

That isn’t trading

If you were to trade, better to set a 50 pips stop-loss

In other words, keep a loss-limiting setting

Ultimately

The trades that involve nampin plus zero-cut

If reversals occur,

They’re at the d’Alembert level with a stop-loss, so you should think in terms of d’Alembert

Loss control is

After losing twice

A nampin success of 0.5:1

A pattern of winning and losing

Only small losses or break-even; large losses will lose anyway

Nampin strategy tends to become large losses, so it’s pointless

※ If you want to keep earning with FX, click here ↓