To increase capital through mechanical action must be market-responsive

To increase capital with mechanical operation

It must be market-responsive

Trade according to price trends, not just looking at ranges

Repeating increases and decreases is a natural measure

Because averaging down is like stopping out

In the market, there is a “cup that always yields profit” when it responds to price

And if you cannot grasp it by numbers or logic, you cannot call it a cup

In other words, it must be that trading will inevitably lead to growth

This means you can perform a perfect logical bet on the price movement

That is the cup

Furthermore, in probabilistic thinking

There is a reflex system and a contemplative system

If there are times when you must switch to the contemplative system

I think it is fine to take a break

Because the reflex system will come again

Market movements are not so big

By making logical bets and ensuring “profit occurs at some point,” that is the trick of the cup

Even if you keep watching the market, profits come and you continue to grow

The contemplative system itself is a mental theory

Essentially, only the reflex system is the trick to increasing capital

The market either goes up or goes back

By the strength and weakness of that, and with rising and falling values, lead profits to occur “inevitably in the middle”

If it becomes too mechanical, you will lose

Somewhat approximate system is preferable

If you’re going to average down,

Here is why pyramid averaging is better

The averaging-down logic itself

Is a method that makes profits while retreating when losses occur

It is not a logic based on profits being present from the start

A logic based on profits being present would be

Aiming for one-way profit; doing it in one shot is the logic based on profits

In averaging down,

You aim for profits whether the price advances or retreats; the risk only increases

Thus it is opposite to the profit-first logic

It is better to use a hedged approach with averaging down and pyramid to offset and aim for profits

Win rate is

↓

↑

higher

Profit margin is

↑

↓

higher

Trade hedged by averaging down against the trend

Add Dialnble (Dalnble) to that

Win rate is

↓

↑

higher, so

A Dalnble averaging-down is ideal

Profit margin is

↑

↓

higher

Pira (Pira) should reduce lot size; that is the ideal

A single-shot Dalnble is the basic structure

There is no intrinsic fair value in the market

Early switching is the basic structure

Switch between up and down

Finish at the third time

After that, switch averaging down

Then proceed to lock in profits

Check the market with a grid

If you cannot increase it through exchanges within that grid

There is no cup

A cup is

Only the answer that it exists within the profit margin

Only a one-shot trade would become the cup

Cup = appropriate one-shot trade

Not expecting the market to always swing is the cup of capital increase

Therefore, forex street that uses a 1:1 range and 1:2 trend is just increasing because of that

Averaging down

1 → 2 → 3 →

Pira

4 → 3 → 2 → 1 → 1

If it goes back, average down

If it goes forward, pyramid

A transfer simply follows the Dalnble

3

↓

4 → 5 → 6

Do it like that

Choose brokers with small spreads

Large spreads require more time

Hedged averaging-down Dalnble to increase; pyramids to decrease

One-shot Dalnble

Decide whether to shorten the time waiting

Don’t place a stop on the trend-following pyramid

1 = initial position; 2 = next position is not the lot size

1 → 2 → 3 → 4

If the pyramid returns to 1, cut losses (take profit via averaging down)

Proceed in the same manner; eventually profits will simply increase

One shot

+9

Trend-following pyramid

Compared to losses, the number of losses is about four times higher

Dalnble can lose if you miss the timing even once

Therefore, you must have a logic that can achieve a streak of wins at least

If you place averaging-down on a horizontal line, you will lose

If you place pyramids, you will not win

It is only a matter of whether you are in a salt position or not

Holding long-term is the key to increasing wealth

The idea that averaging down guarantees a win is

“It means you can continuously increase”

This is an impossible notion in the market

Then if you do the opposite pyramid, you will win

But simply pyramid down will only lose

The reason is that you are not implementing the counter-indicator of the averaging-down losses

In Martingale theory

It is the reverse Martingale of ten consecutive wins or more

In other words, you are not leaving the pyramid as is

Not imposing limits is the secret to increasing

※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, click here ↓