The Holy Grail of capital increases, the contraption, brings about the opposite effect from trades
Make trades that have the opposite effect
Same goes for betting systems
Same goes for timing strategies
Reverse Martingale
D'Alembert
One Nimppen Martingale
One D'Alembert Nimppen Martingale
D'Alembert Reverse Martingale
D'Alembert High Return
Reverse D'Alembert High Return
12 hours and reservation
Binary center strategy and external strategy
Ups and downs become highly amplified rarely
Aside from partial sells, all returns are fixed at double
Take risks; return doubles; keep losing
Betting system
Wait for time; trade strategy
If you think about this, you can create the Holy Grail
High-multiplier D'Alembert
Low-multiplier Reverse D'Alembert
Profit: D'Alembert
Win rate: Reverse D'Alembert, Reverse Martingale
High return: D'Alembert, Reverse D'Alembert
Range: D'Alembert
Trend: Reverse D'Alembert
Low win rate: D'Alembert
High win rate: Reverse D'Alembert
High-win trend: Reverse D'Alembert
When losing continually, use D'Alembert
When winning continually, use reverse D'Alembert
Profit comes from reverse D'Alembert
Because of returns, use D'Alembert
Reverse Martingale ends when you lose
With reverse D'Alembert, if you end when you lose, it becomes profitable
If you adopt the shape of reverse D'Alembert, you will surely retain profit
From 1:3 or better, reverse D'Alembert becomes favorable
1:2 is from the third round
Roulette has no 1:3 payout by rule, but
you can pseudo-create payout via betting decisions
No matter if price moves up or down
Pyramiding is being used
The market is
Horizontal or angled
Reverse trend is horizontal
Reverse trend is angled
Trend is angled
Reverse trend D'Alembert Nimppen
Trend-following reverse D'Alembert Pyramid
Reverse trend D'Alembert Nimppen → Trend-following D'Alembert Pyramid
Rather than even spread
Definitely better to use D'Alembert
Nimppen and Pyramid should be used with a limited number of times
D'Alembert is all you need
Even spreads also have high failure rates
D'Alembert is the most reasonable method
20
210
30
465
40
810
50
1265
D'Alembert
0.1%
0.01%
Clear losing spots
Hard-to-see losing spots
This is the inverse indicator
Trend-following Pyramid
Reverse trend Nimppen works on 4th or 5th attempt → trend-following profits begin around 80–100 pips
If reverse trend fails and breaks out, trend-following succeeds
If trend-following fails, it creates a staircase trend
Just turn it into a pyramid logic and you’ll profit
Without thinking about losses
If you keep placing trend-following pyramids, eventually you’ll grow
Ladder
1 → 2
2 → 3
3 → 4
If you incur a loss, take a day off
FX
Time waiting + reserved trades
12 hours, 6 hours, 3 hours
Nimpen D'Alembert
1 → 2 → 3 → 4
Add
4 → 3
If you were making a profit, reset to 1
If it reaches 1% profit at 0.1%, take profit
If profit exceeds 10x, immediately reset to 1
Ladder is more efficient when starting with even spreads
Returns double, so D'Alembert has little meaning
Regarding stop loss
Consider it in terms of win-rate convergence
As per prospect theory, winning is
Just doing trend-following pyramid
In ladder, if price moves against you in the middle, you take a loss
That is the prospect theory and capital reinforcement
Stop loss is absolute
Continue even spreads logic
Ladder is simply a D'Alembert Nimppen with 1→2→3→4, just one set
In FX, use D'Alembert Nimppen until you achieve at least 1% profit
Do not disrupt a stable market view
After some time, if the market view is stable, trade again
Difficult
↑
That's because you have a stop loss in place
If you have a stop loss, it’s natural that it’s difficult
If you time it wrong, you just cut losses
You don’t grow
↑
Because Nimpen is being used
With a stop loss, you’re bound to lose
Because you think stop loss is risk-cutting, you’ll lose
If you’re going to use low leverage Nimpen,
It’s better to do low-leverage hedged D'Alembert Martingale
In reality, low-leverage pyramiding increases
From the market, you must realize profits in a temporary view
Having Nimpen in view already indicates otherwise
In reality, stop loss won’t work unless you mainly trend-follow
You must aim for high returns
Reverse trend is troublesome because once it fits, you cannot admit a direction change
If you admit it and price reverses, you’ll be in a pit
If you’re Nimpening, it’s better to use D'Alembert Nimpen
High return lets you recover losses quickly
Why Nimpen is bad
Nimpen cannot handle post-loss management
Also, you just pray for success after Nimpening repeatedly
During that time, there will likely be profits
Better to use hedged D'Alembert-Martingale or D'Alembert Nimpen
Also, although there is a concept of range in the market, that’s a lie
There is no such thing as a range market from the start
The market ends with the concept of trend
It’s best to think of Trend market and Dow Theory; that’s it
Both range and trend should be treated as trading strictly according to Dow Theory
Never trade using fake concepts like support/resistance or ranges
The market is a concept of trend
Prices move according to Dow Theory; that’s all
Just remember trend market and Dow Theory; nothing else is needed
All Dow Theory elements like trendlines and support/resistance exist within it
If you think about Dow Theory
Movements inside support/resistance are false concepts
In reality, only movements to the outside exist
The market only exists as a trend
A range market is
Only a sign of weak trend
Should not be considered with support/resistance
If you think about support/resistance, ranges, or trends
You’ll be swayed by the market
Believe that the market only exists as a trend
Trade by considering price in points only
All market recognition is a lie
Only patterns currently present exist
Only the current trend exists
Only view in points; that perspective is all that’s needed
If you don’t hold a market concept, you’ll lose just by watching the overall market flow
The overall market is unnecessary
If you hold only the concepts of trend and Dow Theory
You’ll naturally trade along the overall market flow
If you’re conscious of it, you’ll just lose
The concept of contrarian trading is built on the same concept as a range
So trading on contrarian concepts just leads to losses
In reality, only trend and Dow Theory are everything about the market
The market should be solidified only with the concepts of trend and Dow Theory
Rethink that ranges indicate weak trends
Reconsider that prices are moving outside support/resistance
Contrarian trading is against the trend
It is not about timing and trading
Actually, you should hold the concept of repeatedly taking a trend-following approach
As the market moves
You’ll realize contrarian trades have no advantage
No advantage to trend-following either, but contrarian has even less
Because contrarian carries a range concept and nimpen concept
Why I dislike contrarian trading
Because it depends on timing
So it becomes trading based on trend-following or trend recognition
From the start, you aren’t trading with contrarian concepts
The logic and everything else are useless
From the start, you should strip all of that away
It’s better to understand what premise capital reinforcement occurs under
Market moves up and down
Not a box and not a range
A cycle of trend and Dow Theory
Reasons for stopping loss when performing trend-following pyramid
Because I stop losses at the minimum
Then profits become maximal; that’s all
As a way to profit with the Ladder
It is the inverse indicator of Nimpen Martingale
This can only be constructed with a trend-following pyramid Martingale
Hedged trend-following reserving pyramid
RSI
Williams
Envelope
Begin Pyramid as is
Where you place the stop loss doesn’t matter
In the end, the pyramid wins
If you simply place a Nimpen limit in the opposite direction,
you’ll end up losing in the end
Analysis method is waiting for time
24 hours delays the occurrence of a trend
Test with 12 or 24 on a daily chart
5:1
Nimpen and Pyramid
If a stop is in place, profits will extend and succeed
Nimpen and Pyramid
If you place many reservations, you’ll lose
Manual and reservations
No difference
Reservation (Nimpen and Pyramid placing 10 pips repeatedly) will only lose
Set it for 3 rounds, etc.
Trend
3-hour waiting
Range
12-hour reservation wait
Contrarian trading
Will lose if not a planned trade
Only trend-following consistently makes money
Technical analysis does not work
Trends are stairs, angles, or boxes; nothing else
If the market moves moderately
It will behave like trend-following analysis, but
There are patterns, and a breakout from those patterns changes the market
Therefore, time waiting is still more efficient
Only three things
Strong trend
One-way trend
One-way range
Reverse indicator trades are practically impossible to reproduce
So simply stick to trend-following
Fixed profit per shot
Pyramiding yields all profits since stops don’t trigger
If Nimpen trades could be traded by market sense
They would absolutely increase, but if you could do that, you wouldn’t be struggling
You’ll end up doing only trend-following pyramids
Without pyramiding, but same effect as pyramiding
Hedged D'Alembert trend-following
D'Alembert tends to take profits earlier
Just follow trend-following pyramids or Nimpen according to the market
※ For those who want to keep earning with FX, click here ↓
× ![]()
