Discretion is a trade that follows randomness

Discretionary trading involves both trend-following and contrarian strategies

Its structure is randomness

If it is not random, then it is pattern-based

Discretionary trading

1. Randomness alternating between trend-following and contrarian strategies

2. Pattern-based tendencies specialized in trend-following or contrarian strategies

3. Pattern-based tendencies alternating between trend-following and contrarian strategies

Randomness or pattern-based

In roulette, pattern-based approaches end depending on the house edge

Pattern-based tendencies specialized in trend-following or contrarian strategies, and alternating trend-following/contrarian patterns—unless repeated, they cannot increase

Simply following trends or simply contrarian trading yields the highest win rate and a downward trajectory

Randomness involves waiting time and number selection by randomness, so you only lose against randomness

Wins or losses are still random, but there is no advantage

Unless it’s a logic that can be increased through pattern-based methods

It cannot become a capital-increase logic

FX is the same, it increases through pattern-based methods

What can be considered in roulette

A fixed pattern logic will lose

Suppose there is a pattern logic of red-red black-black

As a result of following that

Black-Black-Red-Red means four losses

Red-Black-Red-Black means a draw

Black-Red-Red-Red means two losses

There is no way to consistently win a trade

To change this, only consecutive trend-following can work

Not追随するために追随するのではなく、順張りを連続するだけ

In binary options, it is less about a fixed bet and more about

Contrarian approaches tend to work in certain market conditions, but

In roulette, there is no market where contrarian works

Thinking about contrarian in roulette leads to going back and forth and losing

Because contrarian thinking tends to lead to losses

Only a method of repeatedly entering the same region, i.e., continuous staking, can be profitable

When considering the red-black strategy

There is no way to profit by taking turns with a pattern-like chasing approach

Roulette is theoretically random on paper

In reality, it involves cheating or randomness or house edge, all intertwined

Considering this, pattern-based chasing is highly risky

Therefore, the most appropriate is a method that increases the number of winning trades through continuous staking

In video roulette, whether chasing a pattern in a recovery mode or doing continuous staking, you cannot profit

To succeed in capital increases

You must use a pattern that leads to capital increase

In roulette, that simply means continuous staking

If this is an alternating pattern, it is only randomness, so for capital increases it is “impossible”

Continuous staking is comparable to capital increase because

It is not random, whereas alternating patterns are completely random in concept

Continuous staking is not random; it is a provable pattern of capital increase seen in past data

With alternating patterns, you cannot know where they manifest

Because you cannot smoothly realize that alternating pattern

There are markets where a large profit comes from continuous staking of dozens and columns

Only by focusing on such moments does capital increase become surprisingly profitable

There is no need to employ complex techniques

What is needed

The mechanism of capital increase

The logic of capital increase

The pattern of capital increase

The rules of capital increase

Only

※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓