There is no such thing as a loser trader; everyone is a loser trader.

Basically, it’s a contest of who is taller

No matter how much one argues, the state of comparison will never change

Because in markets there is no correct answer

Since it’s a theory of recursion

Any market can be proven with Dow Theory

Any market can be proven with support and resistance

All of it can be refuted in the end, by interpretation

Later interpretations aren’t much different from earlier interpretations

Only things like trend-following technical analysis and fundamental analysis can reproduce trading outcomes

Because, in the end, you keep drawing states that aren’t in the textbook

Often

people try to separate trends from ranges, but

this serves no purpose; it’s just a simplified diagram

In other words, voices changed to high/low pitches, modal and falsetto

are not that different from applying made-up terms like “mix voice”

But in reality, it isn’t like that

Technical markets and fundamental markets

will develop

More precisely

textbook markets (technical and fundamental) and textbook-crushing markets (fundamental)

are

Fundamental markets, indeed

Whether technical analysis works or not, that’s all there is

Therefore

Even when aiming for stable operation with automated trading

Even with diversified logic, when there’s a loss, all will experience drawdowns

From the start, supporting technical was a mistake

That’s why it’s said to resemble poker

In the end, fundamental markets and fundamental analysis become powerful

Because of that, there is no万能 analytical ability

That万能 robustness comes from fundamental analytical approaches

Ultimately, you can perform mechanical analysis, but you will lose mechanically

To win with mechanical analysis

With mechanical analysis, you must understand the market direction

Technical markets are full of lies from the start

※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, here↓