As long as we are in the logic of "maybe," we cannot increase/expand it.
I recommend stopping the "what-if" scenario
This is like averaging down in market concepts
Averaging down is logically effective,
but you consider the losses and gains of averaging down depending on the strength of the "what-if" condition
That makes you more prone to bias
Even if you profit in the market, you may incur losses afterward in the market
You can profit, but at the same time there is a tendency to think in the direction of losses during the what-if process
Because of that, your performance in the market deteriorates
Actually, the majority of traders are not 'bad'; rather, there is a stronger tendency that they have 'talent'
Trend-following trading is = something that amateurs do
Because they are amateurs, they focus only on potential returns with trend-following trades
Since there is talent to increase with contrarian averaging down
'If you can acquire the talent to reduce losses, that would be best'
Most contrarian averaging down gains from it
If you haven't increased, then the return rate was set too low
To increase in the market
It’s about making profits wide enough
Trade while grasping the temporary highs and lows of the market
Therefore, when it goes beyond the acceptable range, you need to consider whether to cut losses
That’s where the poker-like give-and-take arises
The interaction there isn’t about luck
Naturally, it involves whether you "acknowledge the loss" or "do not acknowledge the loss"
That is where profits and losses begin to diverge
If this were the sequence that leads to loss expansion, then it would have been appropriate to cut losses
Profit would remain, and you would have to accept the risk of letting a painful loss pass without taking it
In contrarian averaging down, a significant aspect of the what-if is
To illustrate, it’s a situation of trading strategy under such market conditions
And it’s only that each has a different logic
※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, click here ↓
× ![]()
