Because of its nature, stop-loss is ill-suited for contrarian strategies
Stop losses, by their nature, are not suitable for counter-trend trading
Counter-trend trading requires precise timing
As losses increase, timing becomes more off and market perspective is affected
Also, since the timing for counter-trend trades changes frequently, it is impossible to capture those changes
Ultimately, looking at it with hindsight, it only "feels like you can enter" but
the truth is that in real markets the timing is off
So, basically, when engaging in counter-trend trading, you can only do it in trend trading
It’s either trend trading or a pure breakout
People who say a breakout cannot be used do not understand the concept of breakouts, so they only use it at points where it will fail
Trend trading and pure breakout can be used when considering a single-shot stop loss
When placing a stop loss on counter-trend trading, it becomes a completely averaging-in trading feel, so it isn’t very effective
Ultimately, when a counter-trend averaging-in stop-loss succeeds
It becomes movements like trend trading or a pure breakout
In envelop trading, when considering profits
1:2 becomes the limit; beyond that, considering profits and losses, it doesn’t add up
Even if your analysis seems to be working well, the reality is that you are destined to lose
Other pure-trend systems aren’t that different
Ultimately, trades that focus on highs and lows produce far greater profits
Because they are simply translated into a system that focuses on highs and lows
Analysis is not really required; in fact, it gets in the way
William's indicators are better than Envelopes
Envelopes lack rapid responsiveness
You can understand the trend even without looking at Envelopes
Entering a trend with Williams is faster
A averaging-in can be profitable, but it’s a double-edged sword
It becomes clear when you test with a grid
In the end, you just end up being completely stopped out
※ For those who want to keep earning from FX, see below ↓
× ![]()