If you’re going to do a stop-loss trade, absolutely aim for profitability potential
Common sense suggests
If you are going to do a stop-loss trade, the profit ratio must be
1:1 is not worth trading at all
1:2 also stands out as lacking value
If the market eventually moves in that direction
simply making the initial 1:0 as 1:1 greatly amplifies profits
Also, basically the market
forms a narrow range
forms a noisy range
and therefore
logics like 1:2 must be executed many times to keep the number of successful attempts high, otherwise profits won’t remain
However, trades that only follow the direction
are essentially “profit from the potential for expansion,” so
if it expands, that amount becomes profit
Also, scalping is fundamentally unsuitable for stop-loss trades
because noise tends to occur
If the holding period is long, stop-loss trading is the only option
because you set losses to a minimum and wait for the subsequent trend to generate profits
If the holding period is short, only averaging in (Nampin) trades are viable
Slope changes are meaningful only in stop-loss trades, and
since a move is about shifting the direction held
stop-loss trading has meaning because it is a holding-logic,
in other words it is trading aimed at the trend or direction
You must not change stop-loss to a smaller loss
Only when losses are small can profits be created
Conversely, stop-loss trades that do not set small losses have no meaning
Otherwise, manual loss-cutting with a single-shot or a nap could yield higher profit margins
Stop-loss is based on a profit-rate logic
To achieve profit rate, holding is fundamental
Therefore, an appropriate market logic requires a faithful reaction to moving averages
At this time, while the market generates noise,
it moves in response to moving averages
Ultimately, the envelopes are simply useful
Moreover, simply setting two envelopes of close and far widths makes it easier to trade according to market conditions
Stop-loss hunting too
If you know the concept of profit rate and holding,
you can avoid stop-loss hunting
Rather than being hunted by stop-loss,
the discussion is about reducing the number of trades with a “holding perspective, profit-rate perspective, and directional logic”
Long-term direction
1-hour and 4-hour charts
Mid-term direction
15-minute, 30-minute, 1-hour charts
If the 1-hour chart is involved in a mid-term direction
there is also the possibility of a trend reversal
Following the trend and chasing reversals only leads to losses
Counter-trend averaging out ends at the timing
Basically, one should focus on “keeping up with the market trend.”
That is what the envelope is for
Consider that the width and angle of the staircase change
Trade only the long-term directional trend
Because you get fooled, the number of losses increases
Support the long-term directional trend
Basically, mid-term trading is
not suitable for stop-loss trades
and suited to a averaging-in (nampin) trading logic
It makes sense because you repeatedly apply both the long-term trend in one direction and the counter direction
Stop-loss trades in the mid-term would be self-defeating
In this FX world, it’s always the same
Only chase big trends or resort to reversals
Reversals collapse quickly, and counter-trading is better
In the end
It becomes clear that only following big trends and occasional reversals work
Skillfully target trends and perform contrarian trades
Stop-loss trades relentlessly against big trends
Temporary top/bottom reversals
That’s all
Because big-trend markets never break
In the end
The central line is the MA
It moves while deviating from the central line
It’s simply a matter of whether you trust the envelope’s direction or not
MACD is only a supplemental reference to the central line
The final judgement is the deviation from the MA
With only a single MA line, the movement is twisted and hard to handle
With the envelope, there is a line attached to the deviation, making it easier to follow
Stop-loss
Follow the big-trend market
Trade without stop-loss
Trade using the envelope concept
※If you want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓
× ![]()