Simple capital increase mechanism

The Simple Capital Increase Mechanism

In market terms, you’re just following the same principle as low-risk, high-return strategies

It happened to be that it was simply left in a pyramid otherwise

Pyramid = all-in on the market

Time-wait reservation trades = only trading when the market is effective

In time-wait, a single shot once in a fixed period is the essence of trading

Forex street has kept growing because strategies in ranges and trends such as 1:1 are universal

If you logics-based on phenomena that occur universally in the market, you can “grow anytime”

That would be ideal; do not demand anything else

Pira (pyramid) basically has only negative elements

Basically deviates from the concept of increasing

In the first place, doing it in a single shot before pyramid is far more profitable

The very idea of pyramid is strange

To increase profit,

Start with a single shot rather than pyramid at first

Then increase volume by deploying Dandler (likely Dalambre? ダランベール) with the subsequent trend

With respect to the logic and the rules and the kinds

Changing the method is futile

Basically, the key is the amount and other variables

That itself becomes the algorithm

If you’re going to bet everything on one shot

Aim for continuity or optimize timing; there is no other path

The easiest approach is

A no-thought, continuous strategy like a continuous-bet, but

To make that effective, capital strength is required

Simply aiming for the red-black continuity would end in something like a 10-win reverse martingale

If you can grow with uniform bets, that’s fine

Optimizing logic only for uniform betting is correct

In the case of a no-thought continuous bet

It is a different concept from martingale

In other words,

The midpoint is 5

With strength and weakness, think of it as one-bet or ten-bet scenarios

If there is realistic bluffing and probability thinking

Then it should be possible to formalize them into a logic

If not, it remains mere psychology

That is,

The optimization logic of uniform betting

or

The idea of 10 consecutive wins with reverse martingale

In roulette

Considering red/black, odd/even, etc.,

There are three betting options in 1:1, and the scenarios in which they hit vary

At this time, don’t consider win rate; win rate is meaningless

In market terms,

Simple 1:1 in buying and selling

A simple 1:1 round-trip when hedging

Or the 1:1 characteristics change with the logic

The roulette types imply such thinking

The hitting scenarios are different

Win rate is merely “set” by the rule, not equal to win rate itself

Also, if you think in red/black, you must choose red or black absolutely

Choosing red or black here and applying reverse martingale won’t lead to a win

Further, as you can see from the results

When red doesn’t come, continuing red is meaningless

Thus, within a fixed time, the results are already determined, in a sense

That’s why entries occur only a certain number of times within a fixed time

If you continue trading, all but high returns decrease

If you’re alternating red/black with reverse martingale two-in-a-row, you might see fluctuations

But it tends to decrease

Aiming for returns within a fixed time

D’Alembert, after several tries, eventually reaches a point where winning streaks don’t occur

So basically you won’t grow unless it’s a universal approach like uniform betting or reverse martingale one-shot

In trends, leaving things as they are

In live roulette

Choose red/black with reverse martingale or continuous betting

Either way

It won’t count as growth unless it continues with universal increase/decrease

※ For those who want to keep earning in FX, see below