To increase capital through mechanical operations, it must be market-responsive.

To increase capital through mechanical operation

It must be market-responsive

Trade according to price trends rather than looking at ranges

Repeating increases and decreases is a natural action

Because even Marty runs would be like cutting losses

In the market there is a moment when a guaranteed profit occurs, depending on the market, and that is the "holy grail"

And if it cannot be grasped by numbers or logic bets, it cannot be called the holy grail

In other words, it must be a plan where trading inevitably leads to profit

This means you can achieve a perfect logical bet on price movements

That is the holy grail

Furthermore, as probability thinking suggests

There are reflex systems and contemplation systems

If there are times when you must switch to the contemplation system

I think it would be fine to take a break

Because the reflex system will come again

Market movements are not so much

Logically betting and aiming for profit "during the middle of the gain" is the mechanics of the holy grail

Even if you are in the market for a long time, profits keep increasing

The contemplation system's thinking is itself a matter of mentality

Basically, only the reflex system is the mechanism for increasing capital

The market simply moves up or down

By adjusting profits with numerical fluctuations, make it so that you profit in the "middle of the gain"

If it becomes too mechanical, you will lose

A somewhat approximate system is preferable

If you are going to average in,

The reason to do long and short hedging and pyramiding

The very logic of averaging

Is to take profits and exit when losses occur

It is not a logic based on profits occurring beforehand

A logic based on profits occurring beforehand

Leads to one-way profit targets; doing it in a single shot is the premise of profit

In averaging

Aiming for profit whether prices move up or down; the risk only increases

Therefore it is opposite to the profit-based logic

It is better to hedge and pyramid in tandem to offset and aim for profits

Win rate

↓

↑

is higher

Profit margin

↑

↓

is higher

To pyramid hedges against the trend and average

Add Dial-a-Bell to that

Win rate

↓

↑

is higher, so

Nanpin Dial-a-Bell is ideal

Profit margin

↑

↓

is higher,

Pyramiding should reduce the lot size

The basic structure is one-shot Dial-a-Bell

There is no intrinsic fair value in the market

The fundamental structure is to switch early

To switch between up and down

End on the third attempt

After that, switch averaging

And then proceed to realize profits

Check the market with grid

If you can't increase through that grid

There is no holy grail

The holy grail is

Only the answer that exists within the profit margin

Only a one-shot trade becomes the holy grail

Holy Grail equals an appropriate one-shot trade

Not expecting absolute highs and lows in the market is the holy grail of capital increase

Therefore, Forex Street, which uses strategies like 1:1 on range and 1:2 trend, has been increasing

NANPIN

1→2→3→

Pira

4→3→2→1→1

If it returns, averaging

If it advances, pyramiding

Turn is followed exactly by Dial-a-Bell

3

↓

4→5→6

to be done like that

Choose a broker with a small spread

A larger spread also requires time

Hedging, averaging to increase, Dial-a-Bell; pyramiding to decrease

Dial-a-Bell one-shot

Decide whether to shorten the waiting time

Do not place stop loss on the pyramid in the trend-following

1 = initial position; 2 = not the next position lot size

1→2→3→4

If the pyramid returns to 1, cut loss (take profit in averaging)

Continue in the same manner; in the end, profits simply keep increasing

One shot

＋9

Trend-following pyramid

Compared with losses, it differs about fourfold

With Dial-a-Bell, one mistake in timing can cause a loss

A losing streak occurs, so you must have a logic that at least allows a string of wins

If you place hedges on a horizontal line and average, you will lose

If you place pyramids, you will not win

It’s just a matter of whether you are holding a position in a salt loss or not

Holding for the long term is the trigger for increasing

The notion that averaging leads to guaranteed win is

“It means you can keep increasing forever”

That is not a plausible idea in the market

If so, you can win by doing the opposite pyramid

But simply pyramiding will only lead to losses

Reason is that you are not following the inverse index of why averaging loses

In Martingale theory

It is the inverse Martingale of ten consecutive wins or more

In other words, you are not performing the role of leaving the pyramid as is

Not imposing a limit is the key to increasing

※ For those who want to keep making money in FX, click here ↓