Discretion is a trade that follows randomness
Discretion is using trend-following and contrarian strategies
That structure is randomness
If it is not random, then it is patterned
Discretion is
1. Randomness of alternating trend-following and contrarian signals
2. Patterning of trend-following specialization and contrarian specialization
3. Patterning of alternating trend-following and contrarian signals
Randomness or pattern
In roulette, patterning ends up depending on the house edge
Patterning of trend-following specialization and contrarian specialization, and patterning of alternating trend-following and contrarian signals, cannot be increased unless there is repetition
Just following trend-following or just contrarian trading is the most faithful to the winning rate and to the downward slope
randomness is due to time waiting and number selection, so you just keep losing to randomness
Whether you win or lose, it is random, but there is no edge
Unless it is a logic that can increase with patterns
It cannot become a capital-increase logic
FX is the same, it only increases with patterns
What can be considered in roulette
Fixed pattern logic loses
Suppose there is a pattern logic of red-red black-black
As a result of doing that
Black-Black-Red-Red loses four times
Red-Black-Red-Black is a draw
Black-Red-Red-Red loses twice
There is no winning trade possible
To do something about this, only consecutive trend-following can work
Not by following but by consecutively following trend
In binary, it is less about a guaranteed win
Binary markets tend to have favorable conditions for contrarian strategies, but
Roulette has no market where contrarian strategies work
Thinking about contrarian in roulette leads to losses due to reversals
Because contrarian thinking tends to cause losses
Only a method of consecutive exposure within the same range can be profitable
When considering a red-black strategy
There is no reason to expect profit from alternating pattern-like chasing
Roulette is theoretically random on paper
In reality, it involves cheat or randomness or house edge, all intertwined
Considering that, it becomes clear that pattern-based chasing is extremely risky
Therefore, the most appropriate is a method that increases wins through consecutive exposure
In video roulette, whether chasing patterns or continuous exposure is taken, you cannot profit
To succeed in capital increase
You must use a pattern for capital increase
In roulette, that just means consecutive exposure
If this is an alternating pattern, it is only randomness, so capital increase is impossible
Consecutive exposure is comparable to capital increase because
It is not random, while alternating patterns are completely random-aware
Consecutive exposure is not random; it is a capital-increase pattern visible from past data
For alternating patterns, you do not even know where they would manifest
Because they do not align cleanly with that alternating pattern
There are markets that can be extremely profitable by simply continuing exposure in dozens and columns
If you base only on such moments, capital increase becomes incredibly profitable
There is no need to employ advanced techniques
What you want is
The mechanism of capital increase
The logic of capital increase
The pattern of capital increase
The rules of capital increase
only
※ If you want to keep earning in FX, go here ↓
× ![]()