Fixed-loss small-loss unlimited profit or one-shot loss unlimited profit unlimited

Namping (averaging down) creates unrealistically large losses and profits when you lose,

so total profit can't cover it. Before you can secure a guaranteed profit, you incur losses, and the losses escalate further

Namping trades

the intervals at which you lose in averaging down are surprisingly short,

even if you cut losses at that moment, because the losses are large, the total profit ends up recording more losses as the total becomes larger

that is the truth of nanpin trading

Only a single-shot trade is an appropriate exchange

With a single shot, both profits and losses can be kept constant

Trading is,

even if you decide small losses and large profits, you can't win

If losses are infinitesimal, you can win

but because you can't perform a trade with infinitesimal losses and infinitesimal profits

you should trade with infinite losses and infinite profits

Rather, I think infinitesimal losses with no profit trades are a logic for automated trading only

In the case of nanpin, considering the outcome when you lose on averaging down

the truth of nanpin trading is small losses, large profits

With a one-shot trade, you decide both the stop and take profits yourself

The best approach is to have infinite profits with no losses and no limit

Regarding the method to win,

only fixed-small losses with infinite profits or a one-shot approach with infinite losses and infinite profits exist

Why is the one-shot infinite-loss, infinite-profit approach better? for example, when you know the market direction,

if you fix the loss, when the market moves in your direction and even slightly reverses, you lock in a loss and miss the opportunity

if you make it a one-shot, you can cut losses when it reverses and you think it's wrong, or just wait if you think so

In other words, with one shot you naturally engage in a trade of small losses and large profits

※ For those who want to keep earning from FX, click here ↓