Will you be able to win with 6 RCI even if you can't win with 3 RCI? How does the performance compare to 3 RCI?
『Advance Look RCI』s truth (Part 3) is this.
In recent years, three time RCIs have been attempted by many people, but in reality three time RCI is a common question from those who use it.
I also spent about 15 years ago trying to do RCI with three time RCI, so I understand well both the drawbacks and advantages of three-time RCI.
The performance characteristics of 3-time RCI are that, when using general logic, you can win big when you win, but you can lose repeatedly when you lose.
If you can leverage that huge win potential, even with a not-so-high win rate (70%), you can earn quite a bit.
However, those who cannot do this will continue to lose more in losing markets, so they won’t win.
As a result, among people engaged in three-time RCI, the proportion who can consistently achieve high profits is not notably different from those using other methods (price action or other oscillators).
Well, some manage to win reasonably, but in the long run the number who actually become profitable is overwhelmingly smaller in reality.
In contrast, the logic of RCI6 is built with the primary aim of minimizing those who cannot win.
In fact, in personalized instruction for RCI6, it is clearly declared that “everyone will learn the logic and be able to profit,” and this has been achieved.
The ‘Advance Look RCI’ does not include personal instruction, so we cannot promise that, but the reproducibility of the logic is very high and shared across RCI6, so by learning to the end, anyone can reach a level where profits are possible.
This high reproducibility in the sense of “anyone can achieve similar results” is the decisive difference from 3-time RCI.
In terms of performance, six-time RCI has a clearly higher win rate than three-time RCI.
For gained pips, entries and exits are handled with a systematic approach, so unlike three-time RCI where only a few people make enormous profits, many people achieve standard, good profits.
Compared with RCI3, the only area where RCI6 might lose is the number of trades at present.
This six-time RCI has high discretion, so skilled traders can execute many trades, but RCI6 trades only according to fixed rules, so it does not result in aggressive entries.
However, if you are making substantial profits by aggressively entering with three-time RCI, you won’t be considering purchasing “Advance Look RCI,” so I don’t think there is a need for comparison.
If you feel the advantage of steadily accumulating profits through disciplined trading, you will see the great value of ‘Advance Look RCI’.
Before you realize it, the above explanations have already answered the headline question.
As a logic builder, I want those who did not do well with three-time RCI to definitely try RCI6.
Now, to be continued in ‘The Truth of Advance Look RCI (Part 4).’
……
⇒ The concept of ‘Advance Look RCI’
⇒ The concept of ‘Advance Look RCI’ (Part 2)
⇒ ‘Advance Look RCI’ features (Part 3)
⇒Why RCI used on multiple timeframes still yields poor results?
……
〇 ‘Advance Look RCI’ 4 major features
No environmental recognition required
No multi-time chart needed
All decisions can be completed on one chart, allowing observation of many pairs
7080
Purchase page here↓
『Advance LookRCI6Introduction - SainNo.1 & 10 -Indicators / eBooksBook-Automatic trading / market analysis / investment strategy sales platformForum-Program- GogoJungle