The mechanism created by the FX company that prevents you from having to cut your losses is EUR/AUD! It’s full of points to poke fun at (・_・;)

I have talked about trading in a way that avoids cutting losses as much as possible
What remains　
Although it seems unlikely to win because the Turkish lira keeps falling, what about other currencies?
The currency pairs that are realistically suitable are these.
About the outcomes of a system of the tar litty (triple auto) type set up by a certain FX company for its own convenience

are the three, but while we’re at itAbout the tar litty-type system set up by a certain FX company for its own convenience
I will write.

A few months ago I looked at it and thought, this could go bad... that kind of undertaking.
(It took a bit to find the source of that information at the time ← I forget it a lot)

【That mechanism is in Invast Securities’“Range Focus” for EUR/AUD】


From Monday, December 5, the automatic trading feature of “TriAuto FX” added “Range Focus,”

and customers who hold a TriAuto FX account could use it.

And what Invast arrived at through twisting its brains was EUR/AUD.
Below is a rough excerpt

Choose currency pairs suited for range trading

・The recommended currency pair is EUR/AUD, which has shown good mean reversion in the last three years’ price fluctuations

Fortunately, that page still existsso I borrowed it →Here

…so what happened to this mechanism, which defined the recommended currency pair, range width, and stop-loss width? It apparently broke downward in an easy manner (EUR was weak and fell below the assumed range)
and people who operated this system apparently
ended up with about¥400,000loss confirmed...

【Problems that can be understood with a little thought】

Three years is too short no matter how you look at it
Even if three years is okay, by the fourth year it fails; even if four years is okay, by the sixth or seventh year it fails, which is common...
They might say they planned to review currency pairs every few years, but such a mechanism cannot be switched easily.
Because a large number of positions incur losses, ...

Even if you extend the span to eight years or ten years, that alone won’t save you, but if you aim for stability and want to avoid stop losses, you should investigate the past ten or fifteen years.　

They picked currency pairs in-house and forced it, right?
The commonality between the euro and Australia is probably that they are both “advanced economies,” right?
Geographically very distant, and there are big differences between resource currencies and the European euro.

Then a quick thought would be Australia and Canada. Same resource-rich advanced economy group, large economies, and fewer geopolitical troubles (no euro exit, etc.).
Even by this alone, AUD and CAD seem to have smaller fluctuation ranges than EUR and AUD → In fact, AUD/CAD fluctuations are much smaller.
…that’s how it is.

The result of the investigation was a currency pair not offered by their own company → if publicly announced and no one can trade it, they would just cobble together another currency pair (・_・;)

No, also likely they haven’t even checked the volatility of AUD/CAD

FX companies’ recommended systems are naturally meant to increase their own trading volume and profits, so this is what happens.
Then would an EA made by traders be okay? → Since they sell EA to earn profits, they publish a trade history that only shows the most profitable periods → When you test EA outside that period, you end up losing badly (sweat).

Then perhaps you just have to find currency pairs yourself and devise your own strategies.
…soThe realistically suitable currency pairs are these.
I plan to cover them in the next article.

I earned money with this site’s credit card application deals

【The site with the highest cashback ratePoint Income】

(Please rewrite this part for公開 to the purchaser)