Steadily and calmly accumulate profits through prudent operation, with an expected annual yield of 28.49% Pips_miner_EA

Total purchases: 2,282 copies, current active real accounts: 783 copies, real account activation rate 34.31% ofPips_miner_EAhas steadily continued to earn, and is currently used by 783 copies (people; since some individuals use multiple copies, it would be more accurate to refer to them as 'copies').

During the same period, about two years and three months before the start of operation, or even earlier, among EAs that have started operating, there are some with real account activation rates far higher thanPips_miner_EA, approaching 100%. Therefore, the 34.31% activation rate can be viewed as low, but among past EA sales on GogoJungle, total purchases of 2,282 copies is the highest.

As for how large a share of our EA purchasers are among EA users, there are no detailed figures, but within our company a considerable number have purchased it. Among the purchasing users, a substantial number are believed to have stopped FX trading.

Now,Pips_miner_EAwe would like to examine with 17 years of TDS backtest results.

    Backtest source data:Pips_miner_EA 13820 Gogojungle TDS Backtest is used

Spread: Variable

Lot: 0.1 lot

is conducted with.

※The unit is in dollars, but the backtest data uses Japanese yen as the base from Gaitame Finest Co., so the units are in yen.

Annual profit: ¥115,579

Monthly profit: ¥9,631

Annual return:  28.49%

Win rate: 84.79%

Average annual number of trades: 499

Average profit per trade: ¥725

Average loss per trade: ▲ ¥2,523

Maximum drawdown: ¥121,666 from the backtest

This is the result.

In actual use, the profits that have been accumulated with a high win rate can be knocked down sharply by the maximum drawdown, which is a common observation among EA traders and something I have personally experienced in operation: “Operate a high-performing EA steadily to accumulate profits, withdraw the profits as they appear, and continue to operate calmly.” Those who have adopted this operating pattern are, in my view, reliable EAs.

Monthly performance

When checking monthly and yearly performance, there are many months with losses, but since 2003 there have been no losses on a yearly basis.

According to NEET's blog on automated FX tradingNEET’s FX automated trading blog, which studies the spreads used by Dukascopy,

From 2005, every five years

20051.61→20101.01→20150.41→20190.37（pips）

and it has changed to these figures.

Even though the starting point of this Pips_miner_EA backtest is 2003, the world of computers and networks has dramatically improved in communication speed and PC/server processing speed. Moreover, due to competition among FX companies, the costs paid by FX traders, including spreads, have drastically reduced.

Even in such an environment, being undefeated on a yearly basis for 17 years is truly remarkable.

【Recommended margin and return?】



The calculation formula for the recommended margin (based on 25x leverage) used in GogoJungel's system-trade performance measurement is

10,000 units × the exchange rate of the traded currency in yen ÷ 25 × average number of lots ÷ 0.1 × maximum number of positions + maximum loss (using the backtest maximum drawdown) × 2×2

Therefore,

¥1,351,753（today's rate）÷25÷0.1×3 positions　＋　¥121,666（maximum drawdown）×2

The recommended margin is ¥405,542.

In contrast, the annual average profit is ¥115,579, so the expected annual return is 28.49%.

written by Hayakawa