[Financial AI Research] Where does Monday's verification start? The order that connects the five saved points to real-account verification

Evening Conclusion: 5-point save match and current live verification are separate processes

Even for the edited master with a deadline of JST 11/2 18:35:47, the daytime live version, effective input, AutoTrading, open positions, and P/L have not been finalized. The 5-point save match from the morning remains, but this does not mean that the trading original票 for the evening has been compiled. The existing policy is to not trade on the warning signals themselves, and to independently consider the subsequent normal signals. An AI-led discretionary approach remains a concept and is not presented as deployed.

Basis and scope of verification

The basis is the day's edited master DAILY_BRIEF, decisions, trades. The scope verified includes the transition from November 1 06:10 to November 2 06:10 JST with no changes to trading specifications, codes, or live deployment; the 06:11 SHA256 of the local 5 files remains equal to the previous day; and the October 30 GOLD13SX v1.09 deployment records are not replaced as direct evidence that the terminal on November 2 is loading the same version. Do not treat differently named series as the same.

Limitations and what will be checked next

The limitation is that the fresh heartbeat, positions, results, and broker/account history for the day are not found in the verified Drive materials. Since orders and settlements are unverified, the counts and P/L are not reset to zero. Next, we need readings of the live live version, actual input, AutoTrading, and positions at the same time, and to map from natural candidates to order originals. This explains the verification conditions that follow, and is not a request from the article's editor to change trading environments or to issue verification orders.

Morning material: scope of verification up to 06:10 handover

Conclusion: At the start of the week, focus on aligning the items that are “in motion”

“If the saved files did not change over the weekend, will Monday's EA verification immediately proceed to performance comparison?” From the morning 11/2 materials, it is first necessary to align the saved items, the live version, the actual settings, and the handling of individual trades. The 5-point SHA256 match is in progress, but it does not state that the current value of the live account has been confirmed by those 5 points. Monday’s research will begin by separating additional evidence from the next required evidence.

The purpose this time is not to reread the same explanation every day. We should keep records that allow comparison with the previous day and clearly indicate how far that comparison reaches. Conclusions like “the same as the previous day” require a comparison target. Do not treat the saved code contents, running program, or order conditions with a single word and leave them as-is.

Basis: The handover verifier checked five saved files

The morning handover reports that the SHA256 of the five items — FUNDAFX_EA5 source and executable, GOLD13_Signal source and executable, and the saved chart — matches the previous day. The unit is the number of files. This is not a count of five signals, five orders, or five run tests. The fact that there are source and executable files does not mean two different EAs were running.

SHA256 is used to verify saved contents. It confirms whether the contents of the target files match at the verification time. However, this value alone cannot confirm that the trading device is reading those saved items. The live environment’s reading state is a separate observation target. The article will show explicitly what was compared rather than listing long verification strings as the result.

The handover engineer states that from November 1 06:10 to November 2 06:10, there were no changes to trading specifications, codes, or live deployment. This is a report of that engineer’s scope of work. It does not extend to an independent audit proving that no changes occurred across all handlers and environments. Even if the work records and saved items align, it remains important not to confirm beyond the scope of the target processes.

Research entry point: linking saved items with the running version

What we want to know in live account verification is which version and settings processed the natural candidates. To do this, we must verify not only the names of saved files but also the series and version loaded on the terminal. A similarly named but different series, or a version previously confirmed in live checks, will not automatically be treated as identical to the current five saved items. If there is no required alignment, that field remains unverified.

The live version and settings are meaningful to confirm at the same time. Even if the version is known, if the settings are still old, it cannot be claimed that the verification is under the same conditions. Conversely, knowing only the settings screen without knowing which version loaded it makes interpretation difficult. In this morning’s material, there is no direct evidence that one set was re-acquired, so the current state is not concluded.

Do not replace an old chart’s save time with Monday’s screen

The final update of the chart, one of the saved five items, is reported as JST 10/20 06:50:22. This attribute is the timestamp of the saved item. The chart time displayed on the terminal on November 2 does not necessarily directly reflect the time when the last settings were changed. Merely finding an old save timestamp cannot be used as evidence that the live environment is old.

Saved charts serve as a reference for confirmation. In the future, if the actual screen state can be obtained, the difference from the saved version can be considered. However, we will not claim “running under correct settings” or “settings broken” when there is no corresponding action. If two hypotheses cannot both be confirmed, we will specify the necessary observations rather than favoring one convenient answer.

Limitation: even if files match, profit-comparison criteria are not aligned

The materials consider the current live version of the EA and indicators loaded in production, Gemini settings, AutoTrading, held positions, tickets, signals and executions, and P/L as unverified. “Unverified” does not mean each item is off, empty, or zero. Leaving the actual account results field blank is not to hide losses or show gains conservatively; it is because there is no corresponding original record to map to.

To compare performance, the same target period, quantity, currency, costs, and attribution to the EA are required. Even if the entire account numbers are available, they should be treated separately from the records of the target EAs. This morning’s handover is a set of materials with identical saved content and does not present two comparable trade-result groups. Therefore, calculations of improvement rate, win rate, or success of resumption of operation are not made from this five-point set.

If past live checks exist in another document, this does not cancel them. The past is preserved as observed at the time, and we distinguish the scope that has not been directly re-verified now. Updating records is not about erasing past results but verifying what can be carried over to a new point in time. The more identical file names exist, the more important it is not to omit dates and environments.

Next verification: track one natural candidate to the end

In the next live account materials, the first things we want to align are the time of save verification, the live version, and the actual settings. Based on the IDs and times that naturally arise, we will track responses from AI, EA acceptance, order tickets, executions, and settlements. This is the sequence of records required for verification and does not represent a flowchart showing all steps that have passed. We will not issue test orders to fill in blank spaces.

Candidates that are postponed require a reason to distinguish data insufficiency, waiting for reception, and market-condition-driven postponement. Simply not seeing an order does not mean the AI prudently postponed and succeeded. If something was accepted but did not progress to an order, we will trace the same ID’s path. We will not substitute missing acceptance records with another day’s success example.

In Monday’s development, we will first record the progress of collecting verifiable materials. The five-point match can be used as an entry point, but bridging to live trading remains incomplete. If the evening master becomes available, we will add to the article what was verified from morning and what remains unknown. To prevent readers from misreading the morning value as the entire day’s result, we will keep the article’s deadline and the verifier’s scope intact.

Sources and scope of research

Source is LOCAL_CODEX_HANDOFF_2026-11-02_0610_JST. The handover period is 11/1 06:10〜11/2 06:10 JST, and the re-calculation of saved files is as noted around 11/2 06:11. This article’s editor did not independently re-check the live trading screen or original account票. The following section is morning material’s verification scope. The differences in the evening of 11/2 at 18:35:47 JST are noted in the evening supplement at the top.

As financial AI and AI agents researchers, we document our development and validation of custom indicators and automated trading software (EA). We share the research progress in a weekday 24-hour live trading drive. The existence of the live stream is not treated as proof of individual orders or profitability. The terms of service and specifications can be verified onGogoJungle sales pageincluding sales information.

The candidate ID, date/time, and related orders tickets with confirmed trades are not shown in this morning handover. We will not show another trading video for this result and will describe the verification order in the article’s diagrams. We have not performed test orders, trading-spec changes, or live deployments for article creation.