[Finance AI / AI Agent Research] 228 pass with v1.42 improves profits? FIRST corrections and unverified

With GOLD13 v1.42, 228 passes have been checked up to the point of real-world profit improvement; has it been confirmed? The conclusion is that it has not yet. The final draft as of October 25 at 18:30 JST reports creation, regression verification, and VPS reflection on 10/24, while noting that the next natural cross, orders, and final P/L and profitability improvement are unconfirmed. This article explains the FIRST misinterpretation from 20:20 to 20:25 and its correction, and distinguishes saving, deployment, current effectiveness, and profit step by step.

October 25 evening update:Reflecting the DAILY_BRIEF.md created at 18:30 deadline on that day to the same public URL in the morning. The weekly verification window is 00:00 on Oct 19 to 18:30 JST on Oct 25. The corrections and test counts are organized in the final materials and do not constitute an audit where the original code, all test logs, VPS settings, and order originals were re-collected by the article editor. The morning local handover remains as a separate past observation. This time, no trading codes, EAs, AutoTrading, OBS, or delivery status were manipulated.

Conclusion: Read the saves, deployment, and effectiveness step by step

This article is a study and verification of financial AI, AI agents, self-made indicators, and EA research as part of AI research and development. The references are the final DAILY_BRIEF.md at 18:30 on that day and LOCAL_CODEX_HANDOFF_2026-10-25_0610_JST. The former is an editing document that inherits weekly research and deployment reports; the latter is the local handoff from 06:10 on Oct 24 to 06:10 on Oct 25 JST. Updates may be newer documents, but the past deployment observations written there do not automatically become independent operation confirmations for Sunday evenings.

SHA is a value used to compare file contents. If the comparison targets match, it helps determine that the two saved contents are the same. However, which device and which folder were compared is important. The result of comparing source and executable on local yesterday is not a guarantee that the programs read on the VPS, the settings attached to charts, and the current permissions state are all identical.

Grounds: what this morning’s match shows is within the local scope

This morning’s handover shows that SHA matches have been recorded for the local EA source and executable, and for the self-made indicator source and executable, compared with the previous handover. The saved charts show the same comparison results as before. This indicates that no differences were found in the items saved during handover. This article’s program was not rebuilt, transferred to the VPS, or re-attached to a live account.

The update time of the saved charts is 10/20 06:50:22 JST in the materials. It is unverified who saved it, why it was saved at that time, or whether it is synchronized with the VPS. Therefore, we do not infer automatic saving from the update time, nor conclude that the same settings remain in production. The file time and the moment the settings became effective are separate information.

Just because the local logs were updated does not prove that all VPS functionalities are normal. Even if the handover shows SELL display records, it does not guarantee that the EA reception, AI approval, order placement, and execution are aligned. If you separate the layers that display information from the layers that handle orders, you can clearly identify where to investigate next when logs exist but trades are unclear.

Yesterday’s v1.42 deployment record does not negate today’s

The final materials at 18:30 on that day report that GOLD13 v1.42 was created on Oct 24, underwent judgment and state regression verification, and was deployed to the VPS. It keeps the line-breaking normalization of the VPS source and the historical state SELL | WAIT NEXT CROSS at the time of recording. This is a record one step beyond simple local save, but the editor of this article did not obtain the same view on Sunday evening. We treat the source comparison after line normalization and the in-load executable verification as separate.

The concrete misinterpretation begins at the starting point of ticket 30027152. In the materials, MT4 time, the normal first item was originally at 20:20, but v1.41 re-counted from cross-confirmation at 20:25, triggering the second item at that moment as FIRST. We do not cover Japanese time conversion here; we describe it as a relationship within the same time system. It is a case where one must verify the order including the history before confirmation, rather than simply trusting that the item labeled “FIRST” was truly the first.

Just because this morning’s local handover lacks VPS actual status does not imply yesterday’s deployment was canceled. Similarly, confirming yesterday does not guarantee the same today. The correct interpretation is: “the deployment confirmation in yesterday’s materials remains as of that point, while this morning’s production status remains unconfirmed.” If you separate the verification ranges of old and new materials, you do not need to declare either one erroneous.

The v1.42 corrections count as counting only cross verifications on the confirming side as the first event, rather than counting all consequential real events from the starting point to the confirmation. If there is an initial event before confirmation, it consumes FIRST. We do not rearrange order later nor promote the second to be the first. It is an entry point to fix a misinterpretation of v1.41 in the materials, and not a guarantee of profitability improvement.

The branch where the first starting point leads to warnings or strong judgments and then waits for the next cross is not the same as a new rule that permanently stops trading after every warning. It is a boundary not to create extra gates beyond what is in the materials due to prior warnings. This article describes v1.42 as of this research moment and does not silently replace the usual judgment rules written in past September articles.

228 passes does not mean 228 profits

In the materials, 81 state items, 47 starting items, 32 M15-related items, and 68 core-range items total 228 passes. The unit is the number of state and judgment tests, not the number of trades or wins. Compile-time 0 errors and 0 warnings are outcomes of the program creation process. They are necessary quality information but do not verify all aspects of market spread, costs, holding behavior, or trade routes during continuous operation.

In particular, the next natural cross in v1.42, the orders at that time, and the profits and profitability are unconfirmed in the materials. Even if you can confirm the correct order with synthesized inputs and state tests, you still need to verify the entry from the live-belt where natural events flow. Rather than inflating test counts to imply future profits, it is more useful to show which failure conditions the tests prevent and what is excluded from consideration for readers.

EA v1.26, 0.02 lots, risk 2,500 JPY, BE 1,250 JPY, trailing and partial close are unchanged in yesterday’s materials. The unit is the lot size and the setting in Japanese yen, not a guarantee of realized profit or loss limits. Also, the morning local handover’s “no new changes” is within the scope of that handover task. We do not extend to assert that no changes occurred worldwide, including other research tasks.

Limitation: do not reinterpret saved matches as audit recoveries

The weekly materials leave unresolved the freshness of the score, missing and locked audit ledgers, and closed_24h_valid=false on the structural side. Even if saved items match, these records are not guaranteed to be fresh and complete. Conversely, incomplete audits do not prove that all EA operations stopped. The operating layer, order layer, and audit layer must be checked separately.

In this morning’s handover, the effective version of the VPS EA and indicators, Gemini settings, AutoTrading, holdings, orders, and profits are UNKNOWN. UNKNOWN does not mean anomalies were detected, nor that everything is normal. This article leaves this blank as not yet confirmed. This iteration did not perform any trading environment manipulations or setting changes.

Next confirmations: time-stamped effectiveness and natural events

The next reconciliation requires a fixed time and device version and settings, followed by natural cross, candidate identifiers, approval responses, order numbers, and entry/exit/cost mappings. After verifying that yesterday’s deployment file matches the current display, we trace the natural order path. Until this is completed, we will not add trading results or improvement effects based solely on saved matches.

The final materials’ next confirmations are: the starting time, pre-confirm scope (cross-confirmation scope before confirmation), FIRST consumption, signal_id, ACK, ticket, and result in consecutive correspondence. We will check that the 20:20→20:25 type misinterpretation does not recur in the next natural event. This is a verification condition, not an instruction to editors to artificially generate events, resend orders, or change operation settings. Because the corresponding Drive master capture/video is not secured, we do not claim real trading has been verified by video.

In research activities, we handle 24-hour weekday trade live streaming, but we have not independently verified the current live operation against the trading recordings targeted by this article. Because the corresponding master video has not been confirmed, we do not repurpose footage from other trades in the text. Figure 1 explains the verification stage and does not visually guarantee real account operation. Self-made indicators and EAs are studied with saved data and operation logs separated for research and verification.

GogoJungle sales pagewill include a link to verify specifications and availability. The most recent inspection records show a suspension of sale, not a notice that purchases are possible. This article does not provide buy/sell recommendations, guarantees of current normal operation, or profit guarantees. It is by Sunday morning that verification scopes are possible; next natural operation and current actual effectiveness remain uncompleted at handover.

The final deadline for the source is 2026-10-25 18:30 JST. The breakdown of 228 items into 81 + 47 + 32 + 68 is the number of state and judgment tests. 0.02 lot, initial risk 2,500 JPY, and entry price 1,250 JPY are the setting values in the materials, not guarantees of realized profit or loss. The report that no new primary material was found by Sunday evening is separate from proof of no trading or confirmation of current normality. We will not fill in blanks beyond the confirmation scope.