【Weekly Report】Continuation Indicator PRO Weekly Signal Review (Issue of September 28, 2026)
Weekly Report: Continuation Power Indicator PRO Weekly Signal Review (Issue dated 2026-09-28)
Updated every Monday ｜ Tools used:Continuation Power Indicator PRO MT5／Trial Version／MT4／Trial Version
This Week's Note
The currency pairs mainly involving CHF, ending the week with a net gain of 3 wins and 1 loss.
This Week's Signal Performance
Period: 9/28–10/2 (all 1-hour timeframe / counter-trend / martingale / profit/loss width set equally)
| Date | Currency Pair/Instrument | Signal | Result | Pips/Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/28 | USDCHF | Sell | Stop loss (reversal forecast was correct) | -25 pips |
| 9/30 | GBPCHF | Sell | Profit taken (reversal forecast was wrong) | +5.06 pips |
| 10/1 | GBPCHF | Sell | Profit taken (reversal forecast was correct) | +25 pips |
| 10/2 | EURCHF | Buy | Profit taken (reversal forecast was correct) | +20.9 pips |
This week's win rate: 3 wins, 1 loss (win rate 75%) / Total P/L: +25.96 pips
Note: A "reversal forecast" refers to the assessment that the price is likely to reverse soon, as indicated by the tool. As in 9/28, even if the forecast is correct, it may still result in a stop loss; as in 9/30, the forecast may be incorrect but the take profit is reached. The forecast accuracy and final profit/loss do not always align.
Explanation of Notable Signals
① 9/28 USDCHF Sell Signal
- Entry rationale:The maximum continuity was 7, and the current streak was 6 at entry. "Continuity" measures how many consecutive moves in the same direction have occurred; as it approaches the historical maximum, reversals become more likely. This is the basic interpretation of this tool.
- Price movement afterward:The Ask (buy price) reached the next block's (7) entry price, but the Bid (sell price) did not. Therefore the consecutive block remained at 7. Normally, averaging up/down (namping) would be planned here, but no fill occurred. Subsequently, as predicted by the tool, the price reversed and the consecutive block count returned to 1 (the usual take-profit point). However, profit taking was not reached here, and the price reversed further resulting in a stop loss.
- Key takeaway:Although the spread (difference between bid and ask) was small, a tiny price gap determined whether the order filled, introducing spread risk. Orders were placed with limit and stop orders, but manual intervention or automated trading could be considered in the future. The outcome "forecast was correct but stop loss occurred" illustrates that order execution mechanics can influence performance beyond just the trading rules.