Financial Instruments Business Operator Kanto Finance Bureau Director (Kinsho) No. 1960 / Membership Association Investment Trusts Association, Japan Membership No. 012-02323 Go to GogoJungle Home
icon List
FXロジック研究所 投資郎
09/25/2026 01:50
Release： 09/25/2026 01:50
Update： 09/25/2026 01:50
FXロジック研究所 投資郎
Investment style : Scalping
Investment career : More than 10 years
Investment amount : 100 million - 200 million JPY
FX Logic Institute｜Toushiro “Not by guesswork, but by logic, view the market.” At FX Logic Institute, we develop FX indicators and EAs, and conduct research and verification of trading logic. So far, we have provided indicators and EAs to more than 1,000 traders and have been involved in numerous individual support and consulting projects. --- ■ What I value FX tools should not be judged solely on whether they generate signals. What matters is to confirm as much as possible: - what logic they run on - in what market conditions they are easy to use - in which situations they should be avoided - how they look in real time, not just in the past Therefore, we develop with emphasis on forward testing and confirmation on actual charts, in addition to backtesting. --- ■ Tools we are developing Currently, to support traders’ decisions, we offer: 【Gold Canon】 GOLD (XAUUSD) only “No-repaint signals × semi-automatic EA” A GOLD-focused tool under this concept. You can read the signals and judge for yourself, or use semi-automatic functionality as needed. --- 【AI SuperNova Sign Pro】 GOLD × FX compatible It’s not designed to simply hand over all buys and sells to AI. It is built with the idea of providing signal candidates based on rules, and suppressing candidates with an AI analysis layer as needed. We offer AI suppression levels such as AI OFF / SOFT / HARD, etc. --- 【Trade Pilot Pro】 Developed as an auxiliary tool to support discretionary trading in MT5. Aiming to create an environment where discretionary traders who want to make their own judgments can streamline orders and management. --- ■ We don’t sell simply with the word “AI” Lately, the term “AI-enabled” is often seen on FX tools. However, just seeing AI on a label does not allow you to judge whether the tool truly fits you. That’s why I value clearly communicating what AI is doing, where it is assisting, and how it moves on actual charts, rather than selling with the notion that “AI wins.” --- ■ I want you to verify with your own eyes first In FX, there is no method that guarantees victory. Therefore, before purchasing a product, check on actual charts. Test in a demo environment. See how it fits your trading style. I myself place importance on verifying not only the good results but also: “where it is easy to use” “where caution is necessary” --- ■ FX Logic Institute philosophy What we aim for is not “let the tool do everything.” Traders should understand the market themselves, confirm the logic, and have the system assist only where necessary. That is the kind of tool we develop. --- ■ In conclusion For those who want to study GOLD in depth. For those who want to organize discretionary judgment using signals. For those who want to use AI but not rely on it for everything. For those who want to streamline order placement and settlement tasks. We aim to create products that make you want to actually use and verify them. Please take a look at each product page, and check the actual charts and verification content with your own eyes. FX Logic Institute｜Toushiro
Article cover image

Three verification points to avoid mistakes when choosing FX products and indicators | What to check before buying: "Verification, Worst-case, Intervention range"

Conclusion (in advance):When choosing an FX tool,
① whether the content of the validation is disclosed,
② whether Worst (the worst result) is also shown,
③ whether it clearly states what the tool does and does not do,

please check these three points.
If a product does not meet these three criteria, it should be a consideration to refrain from purchasing.


Reasons I organized the verification points

I have 15 years of experience in FX, and for more than 10 years I was a losing trader.
I immediately lost 10,000 yen at the start, and afterward I kept buying information products, signal indicators, EAs, and expensive coaching, totaling over 3 million yen.
The trigger was a 29,800 yen forecasting tool.

Looking back, many of the products I bought showed only “winning moments.”
Why the signals appeared there and what kinds of tests they underwent were not written anywhere.


Verification Point ① Is the content of the validation disclosed


You cannot judge only by “win rate ○%.” What you should look at are the following four points.

  • Validation period and the currency/asset being tested
  • Number of trades (not too few)
  • Whether fees and spreads are included in the conditions
  • Whether results hold up when the validation criteria are changed


Verification Point ② Whether Worst (the worst result) is shown


Products that only show the Best results should be treated with caution.
If the maximum losing streak, maximum drawdown, and Profit factor (total profit ÷ total loss) are disclosed, you can plan risk management.


Verification Point ③ Whether the tool clearly states “what it does and what it does not do”


Words like “AI-powered” or “automatic” alone do not reveal actual operation. Please check the following.

  • Whether signals are emitted after confirmation, or if they repaint or move later (repaint or not)
  • Whether orders are automatic or semi-automatic, and who makes judgments
  • Whether you can control the operation (on/off) yourself


FAQ

Q. If backtest numbers are good, is it safe?
A. No. Past validation does not guarantee future results. Use it to assess the validity of conditions and as a disclosure that includes Worst as well.

Q. What is repaint?
A. It is when past signals are rewritten later. Even if past charts look favorable, the same result may not occur in real time.

Q. What should beginners check first?
A. First, check whether Worst (maximum drawdown, maximum losing streak) is disclosed.

Q. If it is expensive, does that mean quality is high?
A. Price and quality are separate. I myself have been reassured by high price and failed. Decide based on the disclosed information.


In my case, how I turned these three points into a form


Subsequently, I validated line-trading based on daily OHLC and shifted from being a “buyer” to becoming the “one who validates.”
As examples of tools built on validation, there is “Gold Canon” for GOLD(XAUUSD) (shows Best/Worst and Profit factor in the statistics panel) and the “AI SuperNova Sign Pro,” which allows selecting the degree of intervention.
For details, see GoGoJyan. Note that the displayed numbers are from past simulations and display examples.


Disclaimer


This article is intended for general information and an introduction to the design philosophy of products, and does not promote specific methods, products, buying, or sales.
The content introduced in the text is based on past design cases and does not guarantee future results or profits.
Investment decisions should always be made at your own responsibility.