"Is this channel really correct for me?" Such questions were the trigger for me to start creating ACE. Channels differ from person to person in how they are drawn. Therefore, even if one thinks they are analyzing it correctly, their own wishes and desires can unintentionally seep into the chart, leading to entries that are convenient for them. So I thought: "Can we create a channel using the same standard that anyone can understand, and can we verify that judgment against past data?" and began developing AutoChannelEntry (ACE). ACE is not just a tool to automatically draw channels. It searches past a large number of candlesticks to find channels similar to the present, and by analyzing rebounds, breaks, false signals, etc. that occur there, it becomes a tool to think statistically about: "What has this shape tended to become in the past?" I have always enjoyed looking at numbers, thinking about mechanisms, and verifying each step of "why it happens this way." In developing ACE, what I value is not "it seems to rebound somehow," but "why can we judge it that way?" "Is there data that supports that judgment?" There is no absolute in the market. Therefore, rather than relying solely on intuition or gut feeling, I want to create something that uses data and probability as one of the basis for decision-making. That is the fundamental idea of ACE. ACE is still being developed today. By incorporating feedback from purchasers, I want to nurture it into a more practical and valuable tool. Invest Navi Plus will also write about "Why this mechanism?", "What kind of thinking is behind what’s made?" Thank you for your continued support.